$$$ Budget Updates $$$
Return to Top of Page
Pink Slip PAIN


Mayor seeks to boost City Hall's role in Sacramento schools
rlillis@sacbee.com
Published Tuesday, Feb. 03, 2009
Two months into his administration, Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson is redefining how involved City Hall will be with the city's diverse and sometimes troubled school districts.
Johnson is bringing national researchers and policymakers to an education summit downtown, has met with superintendents of several city school districts, and is investigating creating an "education czar" in City Hall.
While Johnson – the founder of Oak Park charter schools – says he has no interest in taking over Sacramento's schools, he already is playing a larger role in the city's public education than nearly all his predecessors.
School administrators said the mayor's involvement could bring the districts closer to City Hall than they've been in a decade. And based on a December meeting the mayor had with top school officials, they said it does not appear Johnson is interested in controlling the schools.
"He obviously has a deep interest in schools. It wasn't like 'I'm going to tell you what to do.' It was more like 'How can I support what you're doing,'" said Dave Gordon, the county superintendent of schools. "He knows full well he doesn't run the schools."
Besides the luncheon with superintendents at Morton's steakhouse, Johnson's education summit shows his commitment to focusing attention on local schools.
Ting Sun, co-founder of the Natomas Charter School and a mayoral volunteer, said more than 200 researchers, educators and policymakers will attend the March 9 event at the California Museum.
"This summit is about bringing the best and the brightest from across the country to help us form our education agenda and vision," Sun said.
Topics include how the city can attract talented teachers and principals, how to persuade national education forces to invest in city schools, the debate over school choice and what can be done to make schools more accountable.
"The majority of our schools are not meeting the academic growth targets for California," Johnson said. "We've got to bring more attention and awareness to our public schools. That's a simple start."
Johnson also said he is interested in creating an education czar in City Hall who "can just talk about the importance of education for the entire city on a regular basis."
While the City Hall liaison is still being looked at, the mayor has begun meeting with top administrators. His first get-together was a few days before Christmas with Gordon and the superintendents of the Sacramento City Unified, Twin Rivers and Robla districts.
Administrators described the meeting as positive, saying that Johnson appeared more interested in a partnership than a power grab.
"He said he does not intend to interfere with district business," said Susan Miller, superintendent of Sacramento City Unified. "It's not his intention to run the district."
Not since former Mayor Joe Serna Jr. was in office in the 1990s have the city and schools worked closely together.
"The last time the mayor took an interest, that had some very positive outcomes," Gordon said.
Serna put his political muscle behind a slate of Sacramento City Unified school board candidates who were credited with reviving infrastructure development and high school and elementary reform.
Sun said Johnson's education summit – and the mayor's increased role with the schools – is a positive development.
"There are many groups who are interested in very similar things and work with each other and around each other, but there hasn't been one leader who has coalesced everyone together," she said.
A wave of mayors around the country has moved to take more authority over schools in the past 15 years, said Kenneth Wong, a political science professor at Brown University and a leading researcher on mayor-controlled districts. The trend, Wong said, is based in part on a growing desire for accountability in school governance.
School board elections generally fall on off-years, causing low turnout and electoral outcomes often decided by voters organized by a handful of special interests. Once school board members take office, the public is forced to fragment blame or praise among a number of board members, rather than just one executive.
"Nobody is willing to take ultimate responsibility," Wong said. "But when a mayor takes over, it's more like 'I'm in charge and if you feel I'm not doing a good job, you can vote me out.'"
Campaigns for mayoral takeovers have generally been successful only in cities where one district fits neatly within the city's borders; that's not the case in Sacramento, where a number of districts fall wholly or partly within city lines.
Still, in some cities with multiple districts – such as Los Angeles – mayors have been able to augment their authority over schools through a variety of shared power models.
Despite improvements in student performance in cities where mayors have more authority over schools, experts say the model isn't right for all cities, or for all mayors.
"Each city is a separate and distinct story," said Mike Kirst, an education professor at Stanford University and the former president of the California State Board of Education. "The feasibility and desirability depends on the local context."
Mayors who have successfully taken more authority over schools, whether through mayoral control or a hybrid model, have public backing and a keen interest in education, experts say.
"The kind of mayors who will make this work are mayors who want to make education a priority and who want to put political capital to work," said Frederick Hess, director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank. "It certainly can work, but mayoral control is not a silver bullet. It depends on the mayor."
And it is a relatively recent phenomenon. How the system holds up after the mayor who got it going leaves office is still a question mark, Hess said.
"What's not clear yet is what happens if later mayors might be more interested in other issues," Hess said.
Call The Bee's Ryan Lillis, (916) 321-1085.
This story is taken from Sacbee / Our Region / Top Stories
Return to the Top of Page
MSNBC.com |
Central Valley Schools Brace For More Cuts
Sacramento City Unified School District Has Already Cut $20M From Budget
theKCRAchannel.com
updated 2:48 p.m. PT, Tues., Jan. 27, 2009
SACRAMENTO, Calif. - More school districts in the Central Valley are feeling the squeeze with millions of dollars in funding to be slashed from their budgets.
Sacramento City Unified School District has already made $20 million in cuts for the 2008-2009 year. Elk Grove Unified School District has made $12.4 million in budget cuts, and Modesto City Schools cut $11 million.
Budget cuts mean that more programs have been cut from Sacramento schools in recent days.
"Music, art, after-school programs, that hurt for my kids," parent Abel Caballero said.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is proposing even more funding cuts for the mid-year. They include:
$12 to $15 million for Sacramento City Unified School District
$15 million for Elk Grove Unified School District
$9.5 million for Modesto City Schools
Elk Grove Unified superintendent Dr. Steven Ladd said reductions in class sizes and administrative support are being considered.
"They've already cut back a lot especially here in elk grove school district. They got rid of the buses," parent Ryan Heintz said.
A hiring freeze is currently in place for Sacramento City Unified School District, and it's looking at streamlining its central offices.
School closures are also being discussed.
"We have lost 10,000 students in the last 10 years and we have not adjusted our facilities to meet that," Sacramento City Unified School District interim superintendent Susan Miller said.
Teachers who will get an incentive for leaving or taking early retirement, will have to submit their resignation letters by Feb. 27.
School districts have until March 15 to issue teachers and credentialed staff layoff notices.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28866461/
Return to the Top of Page
Q&A: Sacramento County schools chief on state education cuts
mnix@sacbee.com
Published Sunday, Jan. 04, 2009
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's New Year's Eve budget proposal includes $5.2 billion in cuts to education over the next year and a half.
Schwarzenegger officials say the plan gives schools flexibility in how to cut costs. Districts, for example, would be allowed to eliminate one of two science courses the state now requires for high school graduation, and the governor has proposed cutting five days from the state-mandated instructional calendar of 180 days.
David Gordon, superintendent of the Sacramento County Office of Education and an appointee to President George W. Bush's National Assessment Governing Board, talked to The Bee on Friday about the governor's proposal.
Schwarzenegger's plan to slice five days of instruction from the school year appears more suggestion than mandate.
It would be almost better if the state said, "This is all we can afford. And we will let you know how many days you'll have to cut."
What will happen is the less affluent (school districts) will be forced to cut the school year, and the more affluent will squeak by and fund-raise to have the 180-day school year. That is absolutely wrong, if the state is serious about closing the achievement gap and boosting education for its neediest students.
And why in the world would you cut one of the science classes needed to graduate? It makes no sense at all, especially when industry complains that the state has too few scientists and engineers.
What would it look like to Mom and Dad?
Well, you know, I think with cutting the school year, (parents) will have to find some day care for their children. There will be fewer opportunities for acceleration or remediation, and they may feel (their) child will be short-changed.
And perhaps districts will have to cut the calendar to 170 days next year. … People may start moving out of the state because the schools are substandard.
What do you suggest districts cut?
Well, for the current fiscal year, there may not be (a lot) of flexibility. We are already halfway through the year.
If we cut the length of the school year, you have to go back in and negotiate with the unions. Why would you, as a union member, agree to reduce your pay by 5 percent?
For the current year, you're going to have do the best you can to save as much as you can.
Where?
Districts (could) cut their state-required budget reserve and cut the deferred maintenance (funding) requirement. But the state would have to allow us to do that. These suggestions have only been talked about so far.
The cost-of-living adjustment, which has already been allocated, at about $300 million, would be another place to cut, if the state allowed.
If districts choose to cut five days, can they decide whether to eliminate an entire week, or choose a day here and there?
Yes, it's all within their control based on what they can negotiate.
Do teacher workdays count towards the 180-day calendar?
They can under certain circumstances. It depends, but generally speaking, districts do not have (teacher workdays) as part of the 180-day calendar.
How does our public school instructional calendar compare to those of other states?
There are only five or six states that require fewer than 180 instructional days. And I believe Minnesota is the only state that allows districts to decide the length of their calendars.
How will the state cut $2.1 billion in educational funding by the end of this fiscal year?
It's all in the work of changing the laws. It depends on how they do that. There is some talk … of deferring the payment (districts) are owed this fiscal year into the next. The result may be that districts will not have enough money to make payroll, and they may try to get loans to make payroll.
Typically, the first source (for districts) to borrow from is the county treasury. But guess what? The counties are broke, too.
Districts will have to find another place to borrow, such as securing a revenue anticipation note from a bank. Those are very expensive in terms of the rate you have to pay. And it's very expensive cash in the best of circumstances. The state and districts' collective credit rating is pretty poor.
So money is not going into the classroom, it's going to lenders.
Call The Bee's Melissa Nix, (916) 321-1090.
This story is taken from Sacbee / Our Region
Return to the Top of Page
More funds urged for California's school meal program
Published Wednesday, Dec. 03, 2008
The poor economy is hitting the bellies of 3.1 million California school children.
State Superintendent of Public Schools Jack O'Connell warned Tuesday that, because of increased demand, state funding for the Free and Reduced-Price Meal program could run dry before the end of the school year. He urged lawmakers to increase state funding for the hot meal service by $31 million.
Schools statewide served 28 million more meals in 2007-08 than the year before, a record 770.6 million, and a 4.5 percent increase.
Nearly 51 percent of California's public school children are enrolled in the free or reduced-price program – some 3.1 million students.
The program, which provides breakfast, lunch and afternoon snacks to low-income children, is primarily funded with federal dollars; however, the state kicks in a significant portion as well.
Education officials believe even more children are eligible across the state, but families may not know about the service. "Our responsibility is to ensure that low-income students have access to nutritious meals because hungry children do not learn," O'Connell said.
In the Sacramento City Unified School District, children qualifying for the program increased by three percentage points this school year, from 63 percent in 2007-08 to 66 percent, said Marc Lemieux, the district's director of Nutrition Services.
"And although the district's enrollment is declining, the number of children qualifying for free and reduced meals is on the rise," he said.
Delois Davis-McDuffie, director of food and nutrition services for Elk Grove Unified, said student eligibility is up 3.3 percent in her district, from 45.9 percent of students in 2007-08 to 49.2 percent this year.
"And those who qualify are using the program more often," she said. "Participation is up 9 percent this year."
Last year, the number of California students receiving free or reduced-price meals increased dramatically at the end of the school year, and it is expected to continue to rise throughout this year, O'Connell said.
Because of the increased demand last year, the state ran out of money by April and school districts had to make up the difference.
Fewer state dollars mean fewer fresh fruits and vegetables, more processed, rather than prepared food, longer lines and reduced access, said Phyllis Bramson-Paul, director of the Nutrition Services Division for the state's Education Department.
"We know districts dip into their general fund money to make up for state shortfalls," she said. "This is not a good year for this to be an option. We don't want districts to be put into a series of Sophie's Choices, if you will."
Call The Bee's Melissa Nix, (916) 321-1090.
This story is taken from Sacbee / Capitol and California
Return to the Top of Page