James Baldwin said it best: "For these are all our children, and we will profit by or pay for whatever they become."

Jonathan Sez
Education News & Comment
2010 SCUSD Election
2010 Local Elections
2010Election Parent Picks
Sacramento Issues
Parent Rights under NCLB
Future School Closures
School Closures 2009
ED Facts & Reports
What is a School Site Council
Padres/父母/Родители/Parents
School Accountablity
About SAC City DAC
Our Schools
Don't Swett It!
Komments by Karen
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
What's going on at your District Advisory Council meeting?
 
 
DAC representatives are at the DAC meeting on behalf of their  schoolsite council. They are not at a DAC meeting to learn about how
to become better parents or how to better prepare their own children  for STAR testing. It is the roll of the SSC to analysis the SCHOOL
STAR data. SSCs are supposed to be addressing the issues - right now -  of how to spend large sums of Title I and EIA funding that are
allocated to their schools for SUPPLEMENTAL programs for those  students most at risk of not reaching proficiency. DAC members, if
they need to learn how to better prepare their own child, should  attend parenting classes offered by the district. There is so much
important work the SSCs should be doing right now to ensure that their  school's plan - the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) - is
prepared based on an analysis of the SCHOOL SITE DATA.

Parent DAC members take on an extended parent responsibility when  they agree to become DAC members. They are responsible for plans that 
affect all the students in the school. Not just their own child. There  is not the time, nor is the DAC meeting the correct venue, for the 
district to present on "Parents Preparing Their Child for STAR Testing".

The district data department - or someone who understands the process  - should present school data. A data discussion needs to include
disaggregation, longitudinal analysis, and comparisons to the "100  schools" list. The data analysis should include current and
longitudinal API and AYP. These data sets need to be triangulated  with suspension and expulsion data, and "grade distribution' data. At 
the high school level it is also important to look at the data  disaggregated by small learning community (SLC). If a school site is
receiving funding for behavioral, truancy, and/or drop-out prevention  the SSC must analize the data gathered to determine the efficacy of
the categorically funded programs. Per EdCode, schools receiving  several different resources (categoricals) are required to include in
their SPSA the action steps funded by said funds, thereby requiring  them to collect data as to the funding's contribution to student
achievement. As stated in the CDE's SSC handbook, "School and Library  Improvement Block Grant (SLIBG)" and the "Pupil Retention Block Grant
(PRBG)" must be include in the SPSA. The budget department has a list  - and allocation amount - of the schools that received funding from
these 2 categoricals. The DAC members need to look at the action steps/  goals/data to see if the funding was well spent. This needs to be done

now.
 
Who is Karen Swett
Karen Swett is a concerned member of the Sacramento Learning Community. She is passionate about education and parent involvement. She works for the SCUSD and is the parliamentarian for Sac City DAC and advises parents and community groups.
 
Disclaimer
The opinions, beliefs and viewpoints expressed by the various authors and forum participants on this web site do not necessarily reflect the opinions, beliefs and viewpoints of the SCUSD District Advisory Committee (DAC)  or official policies of the SCUSD.