James Baldwin said it best: "For these are all our children, and we will profit by or pay for whatever they become."

Jonathan Sez
Education News & Comment
Sacramento Issues
School Politics
Race to the Top MoU
Community Schools Agenda
SAC city DAC FAQs
Parent Rights under NCLB
Future School Closures
School Closures 2009
ED Facts & Reports
What is a School Site Council
Padres/父母/Родители/Parents
School Accountablity
About SAC City DAC
Our Schools
Sacramento Issues
for more Sacramento Issues go the Sac Issues Archive

 


Comprehensive High School Coalition meeting

 February 12, 11:00 a.m. 8491 Fruitridge Road

The next meeting of the ad hoc group of concerned citizens seeking a comprehensive high school to serve College Greens, Downtown Sacramento, East Sacramento, Midtown Sacramento, Oak Park, River Park, and Tahoe Park. Please find the proposed agenda below. The meeting will be held in the conference room at the SacramentoRecycling & Transfer Station at 8491 Fruitridge Road at 11:00 a.m. We encourage you to extend this invitation to any and all who may be interested in working to find a solution for our community.

 

 

Comprehensive High School Coalition Agenda

Sacramento Recycling & Transfer Station

8491 Fruitridge Road
Sacramento
, CA

February 12, 11:00 a.m.

 

1.      Group formation

a.      Purpose

                                                  i.      Comprehensive high school

b.      Organizational structure

                                                  i.      By laws

                                                ii.      Rules

c.       Committees

                                                  i.      Outreach/Communications/PR

                                                ii.      Program, Curriculum, Instruction & Data

                                              iii.      Planning

2.      Data

a.      Attendance area maps

b.      Enrollment data

c.       Fact sheet

3.      Program

a.      Look at WASC (Western Assoc. of School Accreditation) reports of successful programs as model

4.      Outreach

a.      Students

b.      Parents

c.       Teachers

d.      Property owners

e.      Residents


 

 


 

Superintendent Jonathan P. Raymond Letter to Staff Jan. 28, 2011

 
 
 

SCUSD eCONNECTION Newsletter 1-24-11

 

 
 
 

SCUSD Strategic Plan Update January 28 2011

 
 


 

 

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED

Physical address:

5735 47TH AVE

SACRAMENTO, CA 95824

Locale: 

City — Large

Enrollment: 

48,446

Number of schools within the district: 

95

Productivity

Rating
Basic Return on Investment Index 
Adjusted Return on Investment Index 
Predicted Efficiency Index 

Achievement

DistrictState

4th Grade Math62%65%

4th Grade Reading52%60%

8th Grade Math41%41%

8th Grade Reading44%48%

High School Math59%54%

High School Reading57%52%

Demographics

DistrictState
Low income
63%
47%
Special education
11%
10%
Limited English proficient (LEP)
26%
21%
White
21%
38%
Black
21%
5%
Hispanic
32%
42%
Asian or Pacific Islander
23%
9%
American Indian or Alaskan Native
1%
2%

Finance

AmountAmount per studentPercent

Total revenue:

$545,693,000$11,264
 Revenue by source   
 Federal:$78,196,000$1,61414%
 State:$345,913,000$7,14063%
 Local:$121,584,000$2,51022%
     

Total expenditures

$559,994,000$11,559
 Total current expenditures$486,908,000$10,051
 Instructional expenditures$290,622,000$5,99960%
 Student and staff support$58,298,000$1,20312%
 Administration$61,432,000$1,26813%
 Operations, food service, other$76,556,000$1,58016%
     
 Total capital outlay$42,850,000$884
 Construction$39,068,000$806
     
 Total non-elementary and secondary education, and other$10,411,000$215
     
 Interest on debt$19,782,000$408

Other fiscal indicators

 DistrictDistrict rank in the stateState's lowest-spending districts*State's highest-spending districts**Range of spending in the state***
Per pupil expenditure, unadjusted:$10,051255 out of 308$7,702$13,359$5,657
Per pupil expenditure, after adjusting for differences in cost of living:$9,839229 out of 308$7,249$15,902$8,653
Per pupil expenditure, after adjusting for differences in cost of living and student needs:$6,661205 out of 308$5,208$11,382$6,175

* 5th percentile of per pupil expenditures

** 95th percentile of per pupil expenditures

*** The difference between the 95th and the 5th percentile

Sources and Notes: For achievement, we looked at the percent of students scoring proficient or above according to state-defined proficiency standards for each grade. In the demographic section, the state average represents the average value for that indicator for all of the districts included in our analysis. In the achievement section, the state average represents the average score for all of the districts in the state. 

For spending and demographic information, we relied on 2008 data complied by the U.S. Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics. For overall school district achievement results, we used 2008 data complied by the New America Foundation's Federal Education Budget Project, and for district achievement data disaggregated by student subgroups, we relied on 2008 data from GreatSchools, a California-based company that publishes school performance data. A small number of states and districts were missing data for certain demographic indicators, necessitating the use of proxies. For more information on our sources, use of proxies, and our approach to calculating educational productivity, please consult our detailed methodology.

 

 

 


 

January 19, 2011

Return on Educational Investment: Recommendations

Recommendations based on the analysis of "Return on Investment," a district-by-district evaluation of U.S. educational productivity.
January 19, 2011

Return on Educational Investment: Findings

Findings for "Return on Investment," a district-by-district evaluation of U.S. educational productivity.
January 19, 2011

Return on Educational Investment: FAQs

Frequently asked questions for "Return on Investment," a district-by-district evaluation of U.S. educational productivity.
January 19, 2011

Interactive Map: Return on Educational Investment

Interactive map from a district-by-district evaluation of U.S. educational productivity.
January 19, 2011

Return on Educational Investment: Methodology and Data

The methodology used in "Return on Investment," a district-by-district evaluation of U.S. educational productivity.
January 19, 2011

Return on Educational Investment: Glossary

A glossary of terms used in "Return on Investment," a district-by-district evaluation of U.S. educational productivity.
January 19, 2011

Return on Educational Investment: Background Info

Background information for "Return on Investment," a district-by-district evaluation of U.S. educational productivity.
January 19, 2011

Return on Educational Investment

Report from Ulrich Boser presents findings from a yearlong study of the efficiency of the nation’s public education system.By Ulrich Boser

 


Interactive Map: Return on Educational Investment

 

Interactive | Report | Findings | Recommendations | Background | Glossary | Methodology & Data | FAQs | Help

Introduction and summary

This report is the culmination of a yearlong effort to study the efficiency of the nation’s public education system and includes the first-ever attempt to evaluate the productivity of almost every major school district in the country. In the business world, the notion of productivity describes the benefit received in exchange for effort or money expended. Our project measures the academic achievement a school district produces relative to its educational spending, while controlling for factors outside a district’s control, such as cost of living and students in poverty.

Our nation’s school system has for too long failed to ensure that education funding consistently promotes strong student achievement. After adjusting for inflation, education spending per student has nearly tripled over the past four decades. But while some states and districts have spent their additional dollars wisely—and thus shown significant increases in student outcomes—overall student achievement has largely remained flat. And besides Luxembourg, the United States spends more per student than any of the 65 countries that participated in a recent international reading assessment, and while Estonia and Poland scored at the same level as the United States on the exam, the United States spent roughly $60,000 more to educate each student to age 15 than either nation.

Our aims for this project, then, are threefold. First, we hope to kick-start a national conversation about educational productivity. Second, we want to identify districts that generate higher-than-average achievement per dollar spent, demonstrate how productivity varies widely within states, and encourage efforts to study highly productive districts. Third—and most important—we want to encourage states and districts to embrace approaches that make it easier to create and sustain educational efficiencies.

This report comes at a pivotal time for schools and districts. Sagging revenues have forced more than 30 states to cut education spending since the recession began. The fiscal situation is likely to get worse before it gets better because the full impact of the housing market collapse has yet to hit many state and local budgets. At a time when states are projecting more than $100 billion in budget shortfalls, educators need to be able to show that education dollars produce significant outcomes or taxpayers might begin to see schools as a weak investment. If schools don’t deliver maximum results for the dollar, public trust in education could erode and taxpayers may fund schools less generously.

The Wisconsin school systems of Oshkosh and Eau Claire are about the same size and serve similar student populations. They also get largely similar results on state exams–but Eau Claire spends an extra $8 million to run its school system.

While some forward-thinking education leaders have taken steps to promote better educational efficiency, most states and districts have not done nearly enough to measure or produce the productivity gains our education system so desperately needs. Some fear that a focus on efficiency might inspire policymakers to reduce already limited education budgets and further increase the inequitable distribution of school dollars. To be sure, our nation’s system of financing schools is unfair. Low-income and minority students are far more likely to attend schools that don’t receive their fair share of federal, state, and local dollars. But while the issue of fairness must be central to any conversation about education finance, efficiency should not be sacrificed on the altar of equity. Our nation must aspire to have a school system that’s both fair and productive.

Our emphasis on productivity does not mean we endorse unfettered market-based reforms, such as vouchers allowing parents to direct public funds to private schools. Nor do we argue that policymakers should spend less on education. Indeed, we believe neither of these approaches can solve the nation’s pressing education challenges. Transforming our schools will demand both real resources and real reform. As Education Secretary Arne Duncan recently said: “It’s time to stop treating the problem of educational productivity as a grinding, eat-your-broccoli exercise. It’s time to start treating it as an opportunity for innovation and accelerating progress.”

Summary of findings

  • Many school districts could boost student achievement without increasing spending if they used their money more productively. An Arizona school district, for example, could see as much as a 36 percent boost in achievement if it increased its efficiency from the lowest level to the highest, all else being equal.
  • Low productivity costs the nation’s school system as much as $175 billion a year. This figure is an estimate; our study does not capture everything that goes into creating an efficient district. But the approximate loss in capacity equals about 1 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product.
  • Without controls on how additional school dollars are spent, more education spending will not automatically improve student outcomes. In more than half of the states included in our study, there was no clear relationship between spending and achievement after adjusting for other variables, such as cost of living and students in poverty. These findings are consistent with existing research: How a school system spends its dollars can be just as important as how much it spends, at least above some threshold level.
  • Efficiency varies widely within states. Some districts spent thousands more per student to obtain the same broad level of academic achievement. After adjusting for factors outside of a district’s control, the range of spending among the districts scoring in the top third of achievement in California was nearly $8,000 per student.
  • More than a million students are enrolled in highly inefficient districts. Over 400 school districts around the country were rated highly inefficient on all three of our productivity metrics. These districts serve about 3 percent of the almost 43 million students covered by our study.
  • High-spending school systems are often inefficient. Our analysis showed that after accounting for factors outside of a district’s control, many high spending districts posted middling productivity results. For example, only 17 percent of Florida’s districts in the top third in spending were also in the top third in achievement.
  • Students from disadvantaged backgrounds are more likely to be enrolled in highly inefficient districts. Students who participated in subsidized lunch programs were 12 percentage points more likely to be enrolled in the nation’s least-productive districts, even after making allowances for the higher cost of educating lower-income students.
  • Highly productive districts are focused on improving student outcomes. We surveyed a sample of highly productive districts to learn more about their principles and practices. The districts that performed well on our metrics shared a number of values and practices, including strong community support and a willingness to make tough choices.
  • States and districts fail to evaluate the productivity of schools and districts. While the nation spends billions of dollars on education, only two states, Florida and Texas, currently provide annual school-level productivity evaluations, which report to the public how well funds are being spent at the local level.
  • The quality of state and local education data is often poor. In many instances, key information on school spending and outcomes is not available or insufficiently rigorous, and this severely impedes the study of educational productivity. For instance, we did not have good enough data to control for certain cost factors, such as transportation. So a rural district with high busing costs might suffer in some of our metrics compared with a more densely populated district.
  • The nation’s least-productive districts spend more on administration. The most inefficient districts in the country devote an extra 3 percentage points of their budgets on average to administration, operations, and other noninstructional expenditures.
  • Some urban districts are far more productive than others. While our main results are limited to within-state comparisons, we were able to conduct a special cross-state analysis of urban districts that recently participated in a national achievement test. After adjusting for certain factors outside a district’s control, we found that some big-city school systems spend millions of dollars more than others—but get far lower results on math and reading tests.

Summary of recommendations

Policymakers should promote educational efficiency

We hope this report launches a broad dialogue about educational productivity. Education policymakers should encourage further research in this area, as well as convene a national panel to recommend how state and federal governments can better support policies and programs that promote efficiency.

States and districts must reform school management systems

Education policymakers should create performance-focused management systems that are flexible on inputs and strict on outcomes. State and federal governments should also provide educators with the tools, technology, and training required to succeed with limited school dollars.

Education leaders should encourage smarter, fairer approaches to school funding

Education policymakers should develop funding policies that direct money to students based on their needs, so that all schools and districts have an equal opportunity to succeed. Federal policymakers should also continue to support competitive funding programs that create opportunities for reform and innovation.

States and districts should report far more data on school performance

States and districts should develop data systems that report reliable, high-quality information on educational outcomes, operations, and finance.

America’s ingenuity and dynamism have helped make it one of the most prosperous countries in the world, and these traits will be key to boosting the productivity of our school system. Efficiency reforms will not come fast or easy, but they must come soon because our nation can no longer afford schools that fail to make the most of their limited resources. We hope that our interactive website together with the findings and recommendations in the following pages—will prompt a new way of thinking about educational success, one that does far more to guarantee that all schools and districts have the necessary data, tools, and incentives to be efficient with their school dollars.

Read the full report (pdf)

Interactive | Report | Findings | Recommendations | Background | Glossary | Methodology & Data | FAQs

To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:

Print: Megan Smith (health care, education, economic policy)
202.741.6346 or msmith@americanprogress.org

Print: Anna Soellner (foreign policy and security, energy)
asoellner@americanprogress.org

Print: Raúl Arce-Contreras (ethnic media, immigration)
202.478.5318 or rarcecontreras@americanprogress.org

Radio: Laura Pereyra
202.741.6258 or lpereyra@americanprogress.org

TV: Andrea Purse
202.741.6250 or apurse@americanprogress.org

Web: Erin Lindsay
202.741.6397 or elindsay@americanprogress.org


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Superintendent Jonathan P. Raymond Letter to Staff Jan. 13, 2011

 
 
 

SCUSD eCONNECTION Newsletter 1-10-11

 

 
 
 
 SCUSD Board Update January 14, 2011
 

 


 

Viewpoints: Brown's 'Hail Mary' plan puts our schools in peril

Published: Sunday, Jan. 9, 2011 - 12:00 am | Page 5E
Last Modified: Sunday, Jan. 9, 2011 - 10:47 am

In his inaugural address at Sacramento's Memorial Auditorium, Gov. Jerry Brown offered dire words of warning about the budget he will release Monday.

"The year ahead will demand courage and sacrifice," he said. "The budget I present next week will be painful, but it will be an honest budget. … Choices have to be made and difficult decisions taken."

As I read those words – rhetoric, no doubt, meant both to inspire and frighten – I thought of the thousands of men and women who labor in public schools across the Golden State to ready California's 6 million children for a demanding future of increased global economic competition.

For those of us in education, Brown's words induce neither awe nor chills. Sacrifice? We've been there. Year after year, we've been there.

"At this stage of my life, I have not come here to embrace delay or denial," he said.

In education, we've been living without the luxury of denial for a long time now.

What struck me most, though, was Brown's call for courage at a time when – according to sources quoted in the Bee – he is unveiling a risky plan for K-12 education funding that is less brave than desperate.

Brown's proposal is to spare K-12 schools from further drastic cuts so long as voters extend higher taxes in a June special election. In other words, he is gambling our children's education on the bet that he can persuade voters to support tax hike extensions. As one writer put it, he is "playing chicken with voters whose own finances are, in many cases, stretched to the breaking point." Or, in the lingo of college bowl season, it's a Hail Mary pass.

As anyone who has followed California politics knows, Golden State voters view statewide tax increases with as much contempt (almost) as they view state legislators.

In fact, voters in recent years have repeatedly rejected ballot measures that called for increasing statewide taxes, even temporary ones. In May 2009, they voted down an extension of temporary increases to the sales, income and vehicle taxes.

What if those voters – battered by years of foreclosures and furloughs, debt and downsizing – turn down this plan? What then?

California's public schools cannot wait on this outcome. On March 15, school districts across the state will be forced to issue pink slips to hard-working employees based on projections from the Legislative Analyst's Office, which has called 2011-12 the worst year for schools since the recession started. Without any increase in state revenue, schools stand to lose $2 billion in funding in the next school year because of declining tax revenue.

In his speech, Brown talked about "difficult decisions" to be made. The reality is that California schools have been making those difficult decisions for years. Do we lose sports or art? Music or bus service? Libraries or landscaping? Do we maintain class sizes or say goodbye to beloved teachers?

Of course, this mess is not Brown's making. He has inherited a $28 billion deficit and the reins to a state that is, by all accounts, ungovernable due to intransigent party politics. And, to his credit, on his first full day on the job he talked to reporters about Proposition 13, considered the "third rail" of California politics because it is certain ballot-box death for any incumbent or candidate who brings it up.

That does take courage. As a relative newcomer to California, I see that the state's spectacular natural beauty is matched by the spectacular reluctance of its populace to pay for the level of service that will bring the state's public schools on par with schools elsewhere in the nation. Without a structure that will support education, our schools will continue to cycle through boom and bust years, fading all the while.

My point is that California schoolchildren deserve true leadership at the state level – no Hail Mary financing schemes, no temporary fixes.

At a meeting with state education officials in Los Angeles last month, Brown told those gathered to "fasten your seat belts," meaning that his budget would prove a bumpy ride for schools.

And indeed, unless our state comes up with more innovative, flexible and future-minded solutions for schools, we will need those seat belts – if for nothing else than to keep parents buckled in who would rather flee to states with better educational systems.

Still, I remain optimistic that Californians will decide that enough is enough when it comes to starving school budgets (yes, there is such a thing as too thin) and that collectively our community will make good choices. After all, schools should be our top priority, as they represent our best hope for maintaining our Golden State status.



Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2011/01/09/3308277/browns-hail-mary-plan-puts-our.html#ixzz1AeOx6Sv4

 

 

 


 

To all SACS* Scholars

Ready to Roll?


I'm very excited to let you all know that I've begun working at the Serna. I have a desk, a phone number, district email and access to SACS. Yes, that means I can pull your schoolsite council budget reports.

My status is "volunteer", I work very irregular hours, and my "job description" has yet to be fully detailed.  My task is to "connect spending to student outcomes". More specifically I will be helping to create a process whereby the SSC  monitors their SPSA's planned spending. The plan is for me to work with the area directors, Lisa Allen, Greg Purcell, and Mary Hardin-Young. They in turn will let their principals know that I'm available to help them with their plans and corresponding budgets/expenditures.  This has yet to get off the ground, but I'm prepared to begin assisting parents now.

Within the next week I hope to send you each a copy of your budget/expenditure reports. You will be getting 4 reports: summary, detail, resource summary, and position control. I will provide recommendations for printing hard copies and for maintenance.

Many any of you will probably be a little rusty on your SACS reading skills? This is to be expected. I will also have a copy of your report and will be able to help you with your questions via phone or email ---   any day of the week, any hour or the day.

Needless to say I'm extremely pleased. This is truly "full transparency" and a testament to Superintendent Raymond's parent engagement goals.

In this extremely busy time of year, I hope you all will take just a few moments to glance at your reports. I also hope you will all continue to look for more parents who might have a desire to follow the fiscal data at their school site.  Please help to recruit more SACS Scholars.

Happy Holidays,
~karen
447-0585

*Standardized Account Code Structure (SACS)  

Validation Tables

Current validation tables for Standardized Account Code Structure (SACS) software.

When changes are made to the SACS validation tables, revised tables are posted here. If you would like an e-mail notification of updates, please send a blank message to join-sacs-update@mlist.cde.ca.gov to subscribe to the sacs-update mailing list. The SACS software update routine is a three-step process that includes downloading the most current tables from the Internet, unzipping that file, then running a routine in the SACS software to replace the existing tables.

Step 1 -- Downloading the Most Current Tables

Validation Table Files (Revised 06-Dec-2010; EXE; 240KB)

Depending on your operating system, clicking on the link above will open a "File Download" or "Save As" window. Click "Save," then navigate to your C:\SACS2010ALL\Update folder. Click "Save" and the vtables.exe file will be downloaded and saved into the C:\SACS2010ALL\Update folder. Close the Download Complete box and close your Internet browser.

Step 2 -- Unzipping the Vtables.exe Files

Once the download is complete, the zip file will need to be unzipped. Use a Windows tool, such as Windows Explorer or My Computer, to locate the C:\SACS2010ALL\Update folder. Double-click on the vtables.exe file to open the WinZip self-extractor window. The default folder for the unzipped files is the same as for the zipped file, C:\SACS2010ALL\Update. Make sure the "Overwrite file without prompting" box is checked to overwrite the existing validation tables with the current ones, and then click on Unzip. After the file is unzipped, a message will display indicating that 14 files have been successfully unzipped. Click on OK, and then close the WinZip Self-Extractor window. Verify that your Update directory (again, the default is C:\SACS2010ALL\Update) has 12 updated .txt files, one .xls file, and one .doc file, in addition to the vtables.exe file. The .doc file is a Microsoft Word document that explains the validation table changes in detail. The .xls file is an Excel spreadsheet that contains a summarized list of the code combinations affected by this table update.

Step 3 -- Running the Update

Once the validation tables have been downloaded from the Internet, unzipped, and copied to the C:\SACS2010ALL\Update subdirectory, the SACS software update validation routine inside the SACS2010ALL software must be run for the software tables to get updated. Refer to the SACS Software User Guide for further instructions. (The SACS Software User Guide has been installed with the SACS software in the default subdirectory C:\SACS2010ALL\Calendars and Manuals.)

Questions:   Financial Accountability & Information Services | sacsinfo@cde.ca.gov | 916-322-1770

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

Dear Colleagues:
Next week, families and friends across Sacramento will gather at dinner tables to celebrate Thanksgiving. And although I like turkey and mashed potatoes as much as the next person, I have to say that the best part of Thanksgiving is, in fact, “giving thanks” – acknowledging with gratitude things that go right in life.
There is something reassuring in affirming out loud that, despite our challenges, we have much to rejoice in. Come to think of it, this is a good message for all of us in education. Public schools have taken a thumping this year from movies like “Waiting for Superman” and from those justifiably worried about how well our educational system is preparing kids for the future. The truth is, we can and must do a better job.
Still, there is no other country in the world that tries to do as much in the arena of public education as ours. Our schools work to prepare ALL children for college and the workforce, regardless of where they live or how and regardless of ability level. This is not a standard idea around the globe, and deserves recognition.
With gratitude in mind, I would like to offer the following list of 10 things I am thankful for (in no particular order):
Principals: Imagine tossing a ball in the air. Now imagine juggling two. Now three. Now four. Now five. Now 20. Welcome to the world of K-12 principals. Great principals keep all the balls aloft: They direct and motivate faculty and staff, they encourage cooperative leadership, they welcome and engage parents, they nurture and inspire children and they take care of the hundreds of big and small decisions during the course of year that make or break a school. Thank you.
Teachers: The poet William Butler Yeats once wrote: "Education is not the filling of a pail but the lighting of a fire." As we know from research, the No. 1 factor in how much students learn is the classroom teacher. Thanks for lighting the fire.
Staff: They bring our children to school. They feed them breakfast and lunch. They monitor their play time. They care for kids when they are sick. They clean the classrooms and repair our schools where children learn and play. They mow the grass. They answer the phones and fill in the forms and put up the flag and take down last week’s posters. Then they take our children back home again. We can’t “put children first” without them. Thank you.

Parents: They are our student’s first teachers. Their trust in us is astounding. And their support is absolutely vital to our success. Thank you, parents, for joining the PTA or PTO or School Site Council on your campus or for participating in a district advisory group. Thank you for forming one. Thank you for volunteering in our classrooms. Thank you for attending our on-campus events, working in our gardens and chaperoning our field trips. Thank you for reading with your children at night. Most of all, thank you for taking that one moment at the end of a long day to hug your child and ask “How was school?”
Community partners: At a time when the government’s underfunding of public schools has triggered the deepest cuts in decades, community partners have stepped in to help. From the Target-sponsored library makeover at Ethel I. Baker Elementary to the Boys and Girls Club to Reading Partners to the Parent Teacher Home Visit Project, and all those in between, thanks for the boost.
Gardens: Gardens are sprouting up everywhere in our district, turning brown, weedy patches into outdoor science laboratories. Many garden-gloved hands are at work on these projects, and I would like to thank a few, including parent organizations, the Sacramento Area Community Gardens Coalition, our Healthy Food Task Force and our own facilities department.
Libraries, art and music: I know from personal experience how much kids love their computers and video games and phones. But there is magic in libraries and creativity and imagination in art, music, dance and drama. This year, we kept our libraries open and are adding to our visual and performing arts programs. I’m proud that SCUSD bucked the growing trend among districts to shutter these valuable resources that engage kids and ignite a love of learning and school. This is truly a gift to the future.


And three just for me…
Baseball: Things change. Trends come and go. Children grow. Adults grow older. But baseball is a constant. Each Fall Classic (and this year’s was especially sweet for Giants fans) is followed by spring training and the renewal of hope (OK, my hope) that the Red Sox will win it all again.
Sacramento weather: It’s November and my overcoat remains in the closet. Perhaps native Californians miss the significance of this. Native New Englanders do not.
My family: The reason I do what I do. I love you guys. And thank you.
Have a wonderful holiday break.
Sincerely, 

Jonathan P. Raymond
Superintendent



November 19, 2010
Teaching and Learning
The Glow of Art and Science: Tenth and eleventh graders at George Washington Carver School of Arts & Science are integrating art and science with projects this week. Students are sculpting solar powered outdoor lamps around the quad. The students have been learning about solar powered electrical circuits in physics. In art they have been designing and building “cobb” sculptures to house the solar lamps. Cobb is an adobe type material made from clay, sand, straw, water and earth.

Principal’s Big Moment: In a surprise announcement during a school assembly on Tuesday, Earl Warren Elementary School Principal Tu Moua received the prestigious Milken National Educator Award from Milken Family Foundation Chairman and Founder Lowell Milken. Dubbed “the Oscars of teaching” by Teacher Magazine, the Milken Educator Award carries with it a $25,000, no-strings-attached cash prize. Ms. Moua was recommended for the honor without her knowledge by a blue-ribbon panel appointed by the state Department of Education. Cut and paste this link into your browser to watch her stirring speech to students: http://www.mff.org/mea/mea.taf?page=videos&vid=1143

Achievement Recognized: Freeport Elementary School rewarded students for outstanding achievement on the California Standards Tests and on recent benchmark tests during the monthly Student Recognition Assembly held on November 19. Students were also recognized for good attendance and for showing improvement in both language arts and math.

“Educator of the Year”: Sam Brannan Middle School teacher Andrea Guijarno-Zarate is one of 11 educators who will be recognized as a California League of Middle Schools "Educator of the Year" at a ceremony next month. The award recognizes teachers “who exemplify educational excellence and have made significant efforts to implement elements of educational reform in the middle school.”

“Race to Nowhere”: Principals gathered at the Serna Center on Wednesday for a screening of the documentary “Race to Nowhere,” a film that questions the purpose of K-12 education and the pressures on children to perform rather than learn. A brief discussion followed.

Community Engagement
School, Family and Community Partnership Network Forum: More than 40 parent liaisons and other parent paraprofessionals participated in a School, Family and Community Partnerships Network Forum at the Serna Center on November 3. Participants discussed the new vision for family and community engagement outlined in the District’s Strategic Plan 2010-2014: Putting Children First and shared challenges and promising school practices for partnering with families. Organized by the Office of School, Family and Community Partnerships, Network Forums will be held once a month to provide participants with opportunities to receive training, hear from speakers in the field of parent engagement and to share best practices for planning and implementing high quality parent involvement programs that directly support their schools.
Kit Carson and the First Lady: A group of 100 eager Kit Carson Middle School students participated in First Lady Michelle Obama’s “Let’s Move” Campaign event – a “flash workout” to The Black Eyed Peas’ hit “I Gotta Feeling” -- on November 16. The “Let’s Move” campaign is Mrs. Obama’s effort to end childhood obesity in America. During this event, thousands of middle school kids across America simultaneously performed the same four-minute dance routine. Kit Carson represented SCUSD. Students practiced for three days under the instruction of the school’s Physical Education Department (Diana Hoffmann, Nicole Coronado and October Reyes). Way to go!

Community “Goal” Reached: The SCUSD Elementary Soccer Tournament was attended by over 700 community members. Ten local elementary schools competed in a five-week soccer league on Friday afternoons organized by principals and teachers. The weekly soccer games brought nearly 200 community members to the local schools for games. The championship tournament held at Ethel I. Baker involved four teams: Ethel I. Baker, Ethel Phillips, Pacific and Woodbine. Ethel Phillips won the tournament and first place in the soccer league. The same schools will be starting a basketball league in January.

The “Best” Assembly: Kaiser Permanente’s school performance group presented a “Best Me Assembly” at Freeport Elementary School on November 16. Students loved the singing, dancing, and performances while they learned about the importance of staying active and developing healthy eating habits. The following night, the school welcomed students and families to Family Art Night. The McClaskey Adult Ed Center provided a variety of art activities for students, parents and Freeport staff to work on together.

Math Fun, Pillar Two Work: For Pony Express Elementary School’s Harvest Fest Carnival, students designed games and booths based on statistics and probability. Money earned at the booths went back to classrooms for supplies and field trips. In three hours, that amounted to $4,200. Additionally, the school’s Dad’s Club spruced up the school’s garden and the PTA sponsored a successful Spaghetti Feed. Finally, the school held a Family Friday during which parents arrived at 9 a.m. and experienced learning in the classroom with their own children. “Our school certainly demonstrates that we implement Pillar 2: Family and Community Engagement,” says principal Amelia Williams.

Mentoring Boys at a Priority School: Jedediah Smith Elementary School is continuing its partnership with 100 Black Men of Sacramento to provide mentoring services for over a dozen boys in the fourth, fifth, and sixth grades. This is the second year of this collaborative effort and was kicked off on November 11 by an introductory presentation by 100 Black Men member Dennis Lomack.

Operations
Preventing Pertussis: Approximately 1,000 SCUSD students and family members have been vaccinated against season flu and pertussis – whooping cough – thanks to the efforts of Health Services. The district offered a total of 11 immunization clinics -- five during the summer and six clinics this fall -- at various school sites. The Hiram Johnson High School clinic remains open by appointment only until December 17.

Upcoming Events

Doing the Robot Saturday, November 20 – 8 a.m.

Five SCUSD middle school teams will be among 18 middle school teams from the area that will compete this Saturday in the FIRST Lego League (FLL) robotics competition at Sam Brannan Middle School. The SCUSD teams, sponsored by the Career Technical Preparation Department, have spent the last eight weeks building and programing robots tied to the FIRST competition’s theme of biomedical engineering.
Holiday Craft Faire Saturday, November 20 – 9 a.m.

James Marshall Elementary School is hosting its first-ever Community Holiday Craft Faire on Saturday from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. in the school’s cafeteria. There will be many vendors from the community as well as some run by the children from the school. The Rosemont Community Association will also be in attendance.
Thanksgiving Break November 22 through November 26

The Central Office and all of our schools will be closed Monday through Friday next week. Have a safe and restful holiday!
Sequoia Garden Ground-Breaking Friday, December 3 – 8:30 a.m.

School staff, students, parents and volunteers will break ground on a new Community Garden at Sequoia Elementary School, 3333 Rosemont Drive. Made possible by a grant to the Lowe’s Toolbox for Education, the installation will provide the school with a butterfly garden, native plantings and edible produce. Plans also call for a worm farm and composting area.
 

 

Click here to read the SACRAMENTO PRESS

 

 


 

When is Parent Day?

It’s Parent Day today.

Ok. Parent Day was Tuesday of American Education Week and I fell behind my schedule for getting this up, but still. It’s Parent Day.

I remember when I first started teaching sometime in the late 1800s when one of the moms of one of my 4th graders came to the class to apologize. She had always been The Room Mother for her kids, but this year she was working outside the home, and she was apologizing for not being able to be involved.

I said, “You’re going to be involved, because you’re a good mom. You don’t have to be a school volunteer to be involved. I’m a working mom, too, and I’m involved with my kids’ education because I make sure they do their homework and that they don’t watch too much TV and I ask what they’re doing at school, and I make them tell me. You do that every day, and it’s the best parent involvement a teacher could ask for.”

We love it when parents get involved. But just as things have changed in the world so that there are fewer and fewer stay-home parents who can even think about being school volunteers, schools, themselves, need to recognize how when they need to change to involve parents.

I visited a fearless school in Waterbury, Connecticut. West Side Middle School isn’t in an affluent community. There are families working two or three part-time jobs with no benefits just to put food on the table and pay the rent. They love their kids, but they don’t have the time or money to provide all the enriching opportunities that some families can provide with dance classes and league sports and trips to the museum.

Families are counting on that school to care about their children, mind, body and soul. That is a huge responsibility.

Four years ago, West Side Middle School wasn’t what it wanted to be. Teachers were tired and discouraged. Support staff were overworked. Kids were absent too often and too many of them were disruptive and too many of them just didn’t care. Parents rarely walked into the building and some teachers were thinking out loud, “What are we supposed to do if we can’t get the parents to show up.”

It was a rhetorical question. But something happened to move that question to a different level. The University of Connecticut and the teachers’ union on the local and state and national level and the principal and the district and the school board and a few community leaders decided to turn the school around.

There was a little bit of money from the University and the NEA to pay for a little time to get together and plan and to study the results after the plan was in place. But the magic started when the conversation turned to the parents.

They started asking that question with a different tone of voice, “What are we supposed to do if we can’t get the parents to show up.” They wanted an answer. For these professionals, they were determined to do something.

They sent out a survey to parents. They were distressed at what they heard. Parents didn’t feel welcome. They felt disrespected. They felt invisible.

One teacher said that at first she wanted to argue with the results of their survey and tell parents that they were wrong; that the teachers did care and did want them. But she stopped. They asked parents how they felt. Just because they didn’t like the answer didn’t mean it wasn’t important information they needed to know.

Changing the climate in a school is not a task for the faint of heart. These brave folks decided that nothing was going to get better for kids until the staff and the parents were a solid team. They talked, as a school community, what personal responsibility each one had tomake that school a place of respect and energy and inclusion.

I met one of the parents. I asked her what it was like five years ago. A cloud came over her face. “If I ever came to school, it was because my kid was in trouble. It was the only time the school asked me to come. I hated coming into this school.”

I asked her what it was like now. The sun came out. “I walk into the office, and the school secretary stops what she’s doing and smiles at me. They ask me if they can get me a cup of coffee. They’ve got a Saturday Community Day where the whole family comes to a party in the gym with music and art shows and games and prizes. I get to see the teachers and principal relaxing and just having fun and we talk and we laugh. I love this school.”

I could go on and tell you about other teams that came up with innovative literature programs that get kids reading so much that they don’t want to put down their books. I could tell you how teachers are collaborating across the curriculum so that the Math teacher and the Art teacher coordinate around a geometry lesson. I could tell you that disruptions and violence have all but disappeared.

But you have to start with the most important things. Inside the school, research says the teacher is the single most important factor in the success of a child. Outside the school, research says the parent is the single most important factor in the success of a child. Put the most important factors together, and this child will fly to the future. So celebrate!

It’s Parent Day today. Every day is Parent Day.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lily's Blackboard

 


 

About Lily

Lily Eskelsen, an elementary teacher from Utah, is vice president of the National Education Association. She is one of the highest-ranking labor leaders in the country and one of its most influential Hispanic educators.

She began her career in education as a lunch worker in a school cafeteria. She became a kindergarten aide and was encouraged by the teacher to think about going to college and becoming a teacher herself.


New and Continued Great Community Leadership
Congratulations to SCUSD President Ellyne Bell and

New Board Members Jeff Cuneo and Darrel Woo 

 AREA 1

Land Park, downtown,

midtown, Curtis Park.

AREA 2

East Sacramento, Tahoe Park,

College Glen, part of midtown

AREA 6

Pocket area 

Ellyne Bell, school board president

 

 

 

 

Jeff Cuneo for School Board 2010

 

Darrel Woo for School Board 2010

 

 

Click Here to go to Ellyne's Web Site

Click Here to go to Jeff 's Web Site

 

Click Here to go to Darrel 's Web Site

 

 


 

SCUSD Board Member Diana Rodriguez Reflects on the White House Initiative for Educational Excellence for Hispanics


My Dear Friend,

Just yesterday I was at the White House East Room with the President of the Unites States, Barack Obama, to witness him signing the White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanics.

The initiative calls for the expansion of educational opportunities, improvement of education outcomes, and the need to deliver a complete and competitive education for all Hispanics, the Initiative shall, consistent with law, promote, encourage, and undertake efforts designed to meet the goals and objectives set forth in the document signed by President Obama on the 19th day of October in the year 2010.

The initiative also calls for us to work across communities in partnership with one another to help achieve President Obama's goal to ensure that all of our children, regardless of race, are provided a world-class education. As President Obama stated in his speech, just before signing the White House Initiative for Educational Excellence for Hispanics, "Now, this is not just a Latino problem; this is an American problem.  We’ve got to solve it because if we allow these trends to continue, it won’t just be one community that falls behind -– we will all fall behind together."

 



This is why I have taken the commitment to our children in
Sacramento to continue to learn as much as I can and to use my knowledge, skills, and abilities to ensure we provide results and positive outcomes in alignment with President Obama's 2020 goal. As you know, we are not only local or national, we are a globally competitive environment, and we can no longer afford to see things as just a local issue. We have a responsibility to ensure our work is being done in the manner in which it is prescribed in order to achieve the greatness that we know we are.

I have a simple request of you; that you continue to support me; and when I call upon you for assistance, please roll up your sleeves to help create a brighter and more prosperous future for our children; for not only our city, but also our great nation, and ultimately, our entire world.


After all, it's all about the kids. If we fail them, we fail ourselves and everyone else we share this planet with.


Have a great evening and enjoy your time with your families. When you look at the young children in your family, in their precious faces, know that there are people who are genuinely concerned about doing the right thing for them and their future.


Sincerely,

Diana Rodriguez
SCUSD Board Member
District 5
(916) 752-3686

 
http://www.scusd.edu/Pages/default.aspx

 

 

 

 


 

“Our Color System is Education, An Injustice!”

 

Children are labeled early in kindergarten and as late as the third grade, as potential convicts in the California prison system by principals, teachers, school counselors, liaisons, and other helping professionals. The reality of this is that most of these children are of distinct ethnic backgrounds. The number of students and the dominating race in this cycle are young African-American men.  Children are racially labeled as soon as they enter the education system.  Their cultural background may not be taken into consideration.  We belong to an education system in California that is colored. Others to follow are Xicano/ Latino/ Mexicano’s, Native American’s, Asian (particularly the Hmong community), and anyone with darker than fair pigmentation.  In most of our schools if the student body has an ethnic majority; this does not indicate that the teachers’ racial background will reflect the student body.  This is problematic in our schools because none of the organizations that are supposed to address these issues are concerned about the Achievement Gap i.e. District Advisory Committee, statewide, and federal programs. The Achievement Gap is a racial matter. The “No Child Left Behind” certainly left many of our students behind.  It is continuing to do so with larger classroom sizes, pinking slipping effective teachers for less qualified one’s, demotion, and budget cuts.

Parents and students who identify culturally rather than racially are still up against a system that has been racially defined since the inception of public schools. During the Great Depression, public schools in America were not in the business of teaching children English and transitioning them from their native tongue to the English language. The assimilation movement left many immigrants and bilingual citizens scarred. There were school officials who would come to the homes of bilingual students and tell the parents to not speak their native tongue.  Language became a racial category; people were slumped together, and treated as ignorant fools. Our schools are not in the business of keeping our children safe and practicing the “safe haven” policy that is on most school district websites. Extreme amounts of policy and rules are not culturally or racially sensitive to the needs of our children while they are in the classroom. For example, a child drops their pencil on the floor and receives a warning from the teacher for even moving to pick it up.  This happens not once, but on many occasions that is gender specific (male) and racially targeted (color of any skin type). Or a child excitedly raises their hand in class, and the non-ethnic teacher takes this action to indicate that the child is disruptive.  Or a child who is bilingual, having trouble in school, shuts down because he used his glue the wrong way and the teacher became extremely mad.  Now, that child has to repeat their grade all over again because the teacher on several occasion reacted negatively to that child. This is a civil rights violation and an injustice, especially when these children have no behavioral problems. If there are behavioral issues, the behavioral intervention is for the school to begin documenting that child’s incidences which eventually lead to the juvenile court system, foster care, and prison.  The documentation, citations, and expulsions in many instances are not to help the colored child; it is to send them on their way to the criminal system. Schools, principals, teachers, and helping professionals do know how to create behavior problems and anxiety in students. If students are to respect authority; authority must respect students and not hinder their ability to learn. There are many sides to the argument posed in this article. The problem lies on the school which has targeted these children underhandedly/ discreetly because they were in need of extra support, maybe they are a special education student, and the school will then designate a teacher to deal with the “problem students”.  Again, these are all violations of the law.  Another issue is the amount of police officers patrolling elementary schools and looking for a child to get into trouble- this is not effective. Allowing students in middle schools to get away with smoking a joint, getting high in the hallways; but picking on a student who wears a solid colored shirt with no gang affiliation- is a mix of up of priorities. Another real-life example is, a colored child comes to school with corn rolls nicely done, does not sag their pants; but, is labeled as a problem child.  This child and many like him are written up, given citations, and expulsion for events that make no logical sense.

The education system is a colored system and the professionals teaching our children do not reflect color. In the Sacramento City Unified School District with regards to the administrative leadership and officers; it lacks cultural diversity and begins within the cabinet office.  Proposition 209 ended in the late 1990’s where White women and minorities benefited the most from the federal program.  Since the program is no longer in effect there is no monitoring system of hiring and firing practices. Our education system throughout California is colored and corrupt.  Our prison system in California is colored. People can hash out data and statistics all day long. The facts have been revealed time and time again.  Our school libraries use the Athena system for checking out and cataloging books.  It is software that is used in the California prisons, as well. Our schools that get millions of dollars cannot afford to invest in effective software, but we can afford to pay for cell phones for our departments within the Board of Education! The injustice mutes us into lacking action because the colored system has created a culture of complacency.  As long as individuals are willing to sale each other out for the next position, whether paid or voluntary, then the systematic injustice continues on to the next person.  We can complain or we can act! Community members, grandparents, aunts, uncles, moms, dads, teachers, principals, counselors, and even students must realize what time it is.  Education is the key; and it begins in the home.  One must remember that no matter how much our education system may stigmatize, stereotype, label, and not care about the number of children failing in our schools.  Whatever smarts and level of intelligence a person may possess, the mind cannot be taken away.  Education is not a waste; it is simply in need of serious change. Teachers are not incompetent; they are in need of serious cultural professional development courses.  Our curriculum must encompass a mutli-ethnic, multi-cultural, multi-lingual classroom setting in every classroom, school, and in administrative offices.  Most importantly, students need to see people who look like themselves.  Where is the justice when there is no reflection of those cultures and races in the classroom, school, or administrative leadership, and offices?

Reference: The Washington Post at: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/answer-sheet/equity/the-achievement-gap-when-progr.html?referrer=emaillink

Written By: Nekesha Bell de Castañon

“I live the truth! I speak the truth! You can catch me swinging in the haloes away from all of the diablos (devils) that I could never learn to kiss up to.”

Mother of two children

World Citizen

Email: diosadevida@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010.  All rights reserved.

Bio:  Nekesha Bell de Castañon hailed from Michigan in 2006 to California.  She is an advocate for special needs and developmentally delayed children.  A lifetime Xicana & ethnic poet with five self-published books, past assistant coach for children’s sports, bilingual in Spanish to the best of her ability, storyteller, and grew up in the Igbo tribe of Nigeria, here in America.  She is a lifetime survivor of domestic and sexual violence. She knows the glue it takes to hold it together. Her many cultural bloodlines including growing up in-a then-small town-country called Turlock, California, helped her to become vibrantly colorful and cross cultural due to many different adversities.  She has been a lead organizer in different venues for over 17 years:  Political Strategist, Civil Rights, Equal Opportunity, Women Rights, Affirmative Action, Migrant/ Immigration Rights; currently, Human Rights on a global platform, and Indigenous Rights.  She is spiritual; therefore, most of what she does and who she is comes from within. She is a performing artist, entrepreneur, conference presenter, and mother of two children who attend school in Sacramento City Unified School District. She adamantly advocates for the youth, children, and performs yearly with them.  Nekesha is a graduate student, volunteers weekly to help children with literacy, a member of the local School Site Council, District Advisory Committee, Parent Engagement, and Parent Membership under DAC.  Nekesha helps families in crisis, locally and in other states, by lending a listening ear and resources that will get them results. For the last six years, she has been a voice for men in prison, gangs, and other violence that begins to affect them at a young age.  She believes that by sharing an adult male’s poetry and stories; she is able to voice the victim’s stories and raise awareness.  She lives life to the fullest and currently resides in Sacramento, California.  Nekesha can be contacted at:  diosadevida@hotmail.com or you catch her on her radio show at: www.blogtalkradio.com/diosadevida



 

You Are Invited!

Please keep checking back as more conference information is coming soon!

The California State Parent Team and Parents Anonymous® Inc. in partnership with the California Department of Social Services are pleased to invite you to attend the exciting 2011 California Parent Leadership Conference. The theme of this 1½ day event is Taking Parent Leadership to New Heights: Real Families, Real Involvement, Real Outcomes.

The conference is scheduled on Tuesday February 8, 2011 from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm and Wednesday February 9, 2011 from 9:00 am to 3:30 pm at the Ontario Convention Center located at 2000 E. Convention Center Way, Ontario, California., 91764. We hope you will also join us for a Special Networking Reception on Tuesday evening from 5:30 - 6:30 pm at the Holiday Inn Hotel (within walking distance from the Convention Center).

The registration fee is $175.00 per person and covers the cost of workshops, Think Tanks, meals and all conference materials. There will be a separate $25.00 fee for those interested in showcasing materials at a Resource Table.

For those who need overnight lodging, we have reserved a block of rooms at a discounted rate at the Holiday Inn Hotel Ontario Airport, located at 2155 E. Convention Center Way, Ontario, California 91764. The price for a room (single/double) is $84.00 plus tax. Click onHotel and Lodging for more information.

Based on feedback from the 2010 California Parent Leadership Conference, we are pleased to announce that the 2011 conference will include more in-depth skill-building workshops on parent leadership practices, policies and research in an effort to move parent leadership to new heights throughout the state. We have also added a new component -- "Think Tanks" to facilitate discussions on critical parent leadership issues and challenges with parent leaders, service providers and other key stakeholders.

Since California Parent Leadership Month is celebrated annually all throughout the month of February, we will recognize and honor 2 outstanding Parent Leaders, 1 exemplary staff member and 1 exceptional Parent Leadership Program. The deadline for submission isDecember 10, 2010. Click on Award Nominations to get more information on submitting nominations.

Key conference participants will include parents and staff from the public and private sector interested in partnering together to strengthen services and policies affecting families and creating and implementing meaningful leadership roles for parents. This includes administrators, supervisors, and direct service staff who work with children and families in various systems such as child welfare, early childhood development, education, mental health, health, juvenile justice and other family strengthening organizations, parents/caregivers, Parent Advocates, Parent Partners and other Parent Leaders.

We look forward to seeing you!

 

California Parent Engagement Center | Parents Anonymous® Inc.
675 Foothill Blvd. Suite 220, Claremont, CA 91711; Phone: 909-621-6184 x220



 
 
 

Do superintendents Tweet?

SCUSD Organization Chart
 

 

Keys to Successful Parent-Teacher Conferences Click Here 

 

 

“Two people working together who have the best interest of the child in mind

lead to better outcomes for students.”

 

Parent-Teacher Conferences:

October 22 – November 19, 2010

ELEMENTARY SHORTENED DAYS

Check with your school

 
 
 

The Black United Fund
of Sacramento Valley, Inc (BUFSV)
Hosts Ice Cream Social & Campaign Kick-Off Party

 
 

The Black United Fund of Sacramento Valley, Inc

Presents

Growing Our Own

Nonprofit Development Workshops

 

 

 

SAC City DAC Web Site

3rd Annual Report

Click Here to view the 2nd Annual Report



Visitors Report
 
This report details the number of visitors visiting our Web site during a given time period. Unique visitors records each individual visiting our Web site, including new or repeat visitors. New visitors are people who have never visited our site before. Repeat visitors are visitors who have visited our site previously.

Visitors per month for the last 12 months
Visitors per month for the last 12 months
MonthUnique visitorsNew visitorsRepeat visitorsVisits
August, 200923821226727
September, 200931929821748
October, 200928526421677
November, 200927825919590
December, 200919818117489
January, 201021120110382
February, 201027125120445
March, 201040538619576
April, 201040939514600
May, 201050147625762
June, 201048246220722
July, 201034533114488
Average per month328.50309.6718.83600.50


Activity per month for the last 12 months

Activity per month for the last 12 months
MonthVisitsViewsViews per visit
August, 200972716752.30
September, 200974814381.92
October, 200967712041.78
November, 20095909561.62
December, 20094897661.57
January, 20103825911.55
February, 20104456981.57
March, 20105769061.57
April, 20106008961.49
May, 201076215622.05
June, 201072214201.97
July, 20104887491.53
Total720612861

 

 

 


 

SCUSD College Fair

Sunday, October 3, 2010, 1:00 to 4:00 p.m.

 

 


 

11th Annual Hmong Student Leadership Conference

Saturday, Oct. 9th, 2010
9:00 AM - 3:00 PM

Located at the Serna Center (5735 47th Ave.) and Genesis Campus.
For additional information, please contact the Youth Development Support Services Department at (916) 643-7994.

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

SCUSD Board Update Sept.24
From the Desk of Jonathan P. Raymond, Superintendent

 

 


 

SCUSD Superintendent Jonathan P. Raymond

Letter September 16, 2010

 

 

 

 
 
 

Parents Debate the Budget!

Round 6  

 
 

Introducing…budget snapshots

leave a comment »

Today the Observer begins an examination into the SCUSD budget reports, called SACS expenditure reports. This decipherable data paints a very clear picture of how our school district spends its money.

The SACS Budget Code is a 31 digit structure. In an effort to evaluate and connect spending to student outcome, it is imperative to see how funds are allocated — where does the money go? How is it disbursed?

A group of committed community members are currently urging a line-by-line review of spending by requesting the public information contained in the SACS reports. The Observer will help the cause by publishing their findings. We observe and ask questions. We welcome commentary and discussion.

Look for future postings as snapshots — the entire picture cannot be taken at once. Hopefully, an image will develop that holds the board of trustees and the administration accountable to public scrutiny of very real numbers.

Our first snapshot in the current 255-page SACS report:

June 25, 2010 SACS expenditure report – OBJECT Code 5800 (contracts/vendors):

01-4203-0-5800-00-0000-2100-150-0718

Journal # – BT10-03591 (budget transfer)
From the code string above:
01(Fund)  = General Fund (includes all categorical funding)
4203 (Resource) = Title III Limited English Proficiency
0 (Year) = 2009/10
5800 (Object) = Assoc. SUP A, Other Contracts
00 (Bargaining Unit) = N/A
0000 (Goal) = Undistributed
2100 (Function) = Supervision of Instruction
150 (Responsibility) = High Schools
0718 (Location) = Associate Superintendent LSU A
Revised Budget = $100,000
Balance = $100,000
 
INTERPRETATION
On the 25th of June $100,000 was transferred to an account designated for control by “Assoc. Sup LSU A”.
Does anyone recall when SCUSD did away with the LSU structure? This “parking” of $100,000 in this account may have a purpose. But we find it difficult to understand what appears to be funding for a non-existent “location”.  Also, this resource – Title III, Limited English Prof. (resource code 4203) has some specific rules governing its use.
Comments welcome.
 
Click Here to continue reading Parents Debate the Budget!

SCUSD STRATEGIC PLAN
Community Forums
Strategic Plan  2010-14 
 

DATE TIME LOCATION
Tuesday, July 13   6:00 p.m.Serna Center  

 
 

 
 
 

George McAdow Memorial
Memories, Food and a little Music
Sunday, July 18
th
Noon
Sol Collective
2574 21st Street
 

 
 
 

This story is taken from Sacbee / Our Region / Obituaries

George McAdow, 62, social activist, teacher and tireless sports fan
PUBLISHED FRIDAY, JUL. 09, 2010


George McAdow, a leftist activist who supported the expression of all political opinions as a Sacramento government teacher, died July 1 of cancer at age 62, friends said.

Mr. McAdow fought for social change since the late 1960s at UC Berkeley, where he marched against the Vietnam War and battled police at People's Park. A principled socialist, he opposed capitalism and supported working people and liberal causes.

He organized demonstrations against U.S. military actions around the world, including Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan. He spoke out and carried signs at sidewalk demonstrations while defying taunts from passing vehicles.

"It was a sign of his stamina and conviction that he persisted," local social activist Eric Vega said.

Mr. McAdow retired in 2008 after 20 years teaching government to seniors at McClatchy High School. He also was active in the Sacramento City Teachers Association and served as the union representative at McClatchy.

Although his leftist leanings were well known on campus, he did not let his beliefs interfere with professional duties. He brought in classroom speakers with opposite points of view and advocated at disciplinary hearings for "many faculty members who did not share his politics," teacher Lori Jablonski said.

"I'm getting notes from students who say he was one of the only teachers they ever had who let them fully express their opinions and never belittled them," Jablonski said.

Mr. McAdow was born in 1947. An avid reader, he enjoyed sports and playing chess as a boy and graduated from Sacramento High School.

He participated in anti-war actions while earning a psychology degree at UC Berkeley. He returned to his native Sacramento and volunteered at an anti-draft center, where he met his life partner, labor organizer Ruth Jane Holbrook.

The couple co-owned May Day Bookstore, a popular midtown hangout for social activists, from 1974 to 1984. They traveled and lectured in China in 1976 and the Soviet Union in 1978. They read books, talked politics and lingered in European cafes from Barcelona to Warsaw. They were together for 36 years, until Holbrook died in 2006.

Mr. McAdow was also passionate about sports. An expert on basketball, he expounded on the game's history and idolized Bill Russell. At 6-foot-6, he played in city recreation leagues until last year. In recent years, he took up bocce and competed in a Monday night league at East Portal Park.

He advised young people to find a "soul mate" to share life with and to make a difference in the world.

"To be part of a movement that is bigger than yourself and that is aimed at a better world can be a very positive thing," he said.

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.
 

 

Sportsmanship, not brinkmanship


By George McAdow 


This article was published on 09.12.02, in SN&R.


As someone who grew up in Sacramento in the 1950s, I remember that our passion was spending endless hours playing team sports. Like many people, I did not think about the meaning of sports or society.

By the time the 1960s rolled around, those athletes possessing a social consciousness impressed me. I remember the extended fist of Olympian John Carlos in 1968 when he supported the civil-rights movement at the time. I remember Muhammad Ali uniting with the anti-Vietnam War movement by refusing military induction while stating, “No Vietnamese ever called me nigger.” I remember the struggles of Billie Jean King in pursuit of equity in women’s sports, and the humanity and dignity of Arthur Ashe. I even remember a pre-pompous Bill Walton being arrested at an anti-war protest at the University of California at Los Angeles. I concluded that the very nature of the fair play and equality found in sporting events caused athletes to transfer those ideas to society in general.

Well, a lot has changed, including the integrity of sports. Today, we witness Michael Jordan refusing to comment on his mammoth payoffs from Nike, a company that profits from sweatshop labor in the Third World.

Today, many fans seem to relate to sporting events as if the fans themselves were participants with the responsibility of affecting outcomes of games. In 1965, I attended a basketball game in Hornet Gym at Sac State (CSUS). Fans sitting under a basket began to wave their arms to distract free-throw shooters from the visiting team. The home-team coach, old Ev Shelton, went to the microphone to announce that if home fans did not stop this behavior, he would pull his team from the floor and forfeit the game. It worked, and my faith in the fairness of society was reinforced.

Today, our society is seriously considering the pursuit of an unfair contest on the world stage: an attack upon the sovereign country of Iraq. The Gulf War may have cost 100,000 to 200,000 lives. The U.S. sanctions against Iraq since 1991 supposedly have cost the lives of 1.5 million people, a disproportionate number being children. An attack violates all rules of fairness, called international law, as well as all civility between nations. It is akin to a 250-pound, 20-year-old weight lifter getting away with invading his 80-year-old neighbor’s house and stealing from her whatever she possesses.

Let us not embark on an invasion of Iraq that will benefit only EXXON, Mobil, Texaco, Chase and Citibank. Let us return to a time when we had some modicum of social consciousness and tried to achieve fairness. 


 
 

Parents Debate the Budget!

Round 5

 
 

Dear School Board members

Attached please find two charts which represent the cabinet at its previous restructuring (the start of this school year) and its proposed restructuring (presumed to be during the summer). A doubling from 6 to 12 at this high level of salary ranges has to require considerable cuts in lower positions to be cost neutral. I urge you to postpone this discussion to a regular meeting with a request for additional information.

 

Though I am pleased that this item is no longer being presented as a consent item like at the previous meeting, in my opinion it does not meet the standards for transparency and - ironically - for accountability. Reviewing the leadership structure of SCUSD is a significant policy item which merits regular session with its video coverage. That is the way to increase engagement with the public, not moving items to special meetings when time is not of the essence. If it is of the essence, then these job descriptions should not have been pulled from the last regular meeting.

In my training in public administration it is standard to present such new positions in the context of the entire organization chart. In addition to the positions whose funds will be cut to support this increase in high level offices, I urge you to request the entire proposed organization chart so that the big picture is clear to the public and yourselves during the discussion.

The duties listed in the descriptions are indeed important. Most of the duties are included in existing job descriptions. Perhaps the current expanded level of cabinet level positions (10) represents a sufficient increase in high cost support and these duties could be included in a redistribution of duties within the cabinet's teamwork. The superintendent certainly has demonstrated a skill set well suited to both of these proposed jobs.

Finally, I notice that a portion of the proposed funding is categorical. Again additional information would be helpful. Most categoricals have a parent consultation component. What was the advice?

The sweeping of categoricals is the reason given for the decrease in so many services such as counselors, librarians, social workers and others providing direct services to students. Wouldn't these positions represent "children first" along the lines of the teachers' contribution. Categoricals also have been significantly underestimated in the budget, so putting additional demand on the limited resources seems ill advised at this time.

Thank you for your consideration,

Leo

SCUSD expanding cabinet

Leo Bennett-Cauchon 

 

Click Here to continue reading Parents Debate the Budget!


Line by line accountability 

Dear School Board members,

I am writing you again to urge a line by line review of our 2010-11 budget. For me the current discussion about accountability (officer) provides yet another reason for such a review.

Part of the claimed reason for the large number of cuts is the need to replace ARRA money. This need exists only if the 2009-10 use was for ongoing expenses. The recent news that Mariners received a $52,000 dollar contract added to the $135,000 contract to K12 Insights indicates to me that there are undoubtedly many one time uses that have been included in the shortfall projections.

In addition, the projected 34 M spending on books and supplies for 2009-10 when only 11 M was spent in 2008-09, the 23 M projected restricted ending balance for 2010-11 when only 50 K was projected in 2008-09 and the projected 1.6 M unrestricted ending balance for 2010-11 when a 2% reserve is the standard; all provide additional indications for the need of a line by line review.

As our elected accountability trustees, I urge you establish a committee which would provide the higher level of oversight these challenging times require. The dedicated staff who are not being recalled and the students they served deserve this level of commitment. I know many community members who would appreciate the opportunity to participate in a transparent and accountable review. Such a review could be crucial to the success of the parcel tax recommendation.

I would appreciate a rebuttal of my reading of the documents if you have a different interpretation.

Sincerely,

Leo Bennett-Cauchon
 

 
Parents Debate the Budget!
 
 Parents Debate III Parents Debate II

Parents

Debate I

 

Good morning all,

 

Please bear with me one last time concerning the budget and its priorities :)

 

I have attached a corrected handout. The one I gave the board had an extra item (it did not change the totals). I have also attached a bit more of a review of district powerpoints (reasoning), another format to try to explain the restricted reserve (4390) and an unrestricted major funds table. I keep hoping to find a way to shed light on less than transparent process.

 

The last attachment compares this year and next to 2005 in the unrestricted funds. Management chooses to not include considerable unrestricted funds in their budget proposal which makes comparisons difficult. (Other districts do not do this.) Since the 2005-06 unrestricted income is close to the 2010-11 unrestricted I found it noteworthy that the funds for staff (salaries and benefits) are about 6 M less in 2010-11.

 

I have dealt with five budget directors during my involvement with public education. I found one of them to truly understand their district budget. The rest prudently conserved funds by limiting expenditures, underestimating income and delivering categorical resources to sites only as they arrived. At the end of the year, when things were quieter, they cleaned up the budget by moving funds to where they belonged.

In normal times most of the budget repeats from year to year and the categorical carryover provides a comfortable reserve that carries the cash flow until the end of the year when the accounts are settled. Everyone gets what they are use to and the status quo is maintained.

During a challenge the status quo is not maintained and unnecessary or unwise cuts are made. In my experience a simplified narrative is created to justify cuts to staff since that is the area that can most put a budget at risk when it is not understood.

The current district narrative that has been presented to the board is that we need to cut 22 M based on the use of ARRA money to balance the 2009-2010 budget. This money replaced a decrease in revenue limit funds. The fact that there were increases in other state revenue and local revenue is not mentioned (about 10 M). Nor is the fact that we still have not spent down the restricted reserves (23 M) that are held in 4390 highlighted.

For me the challenge is to get the board to consider a different narrative. We could project that state and local revenue will continue average amounts and we could use our categorical reserves to replaced Tier III funds.

The 15 M they are cutting in staff is not necessary for next year. Yes we need to go over the budget line by line, consider carefully our use of consultants and other nonclassroom expenditures and identify staff savings for 2011-12. But we do not need to slow the local recovery by adding more layoffs to the challenge.

 

Not to mention what we are doing to morale, again, in our learning communities.

 

Peace,

Leo

 

916 307-8525

 

Hi all,

 

It is my understanding that the district has submitted interim reports indicating a qualified status (which means it will not have the required reserves projected two years out). A negative status means the reserves are not available in the current or next year.

 

The current adopted budget for 2010-11 has a positive certification. I would not be surprised if the county changes this to qualified due to the various unspecified cuts assumed in the last two years of the projections.

 

In my opinion much of this is a game played by administration and the county to keep the pressure on the bargaining units. Otherwise they would take the changes from adopted to actual budgets much more seriously. A lot of the pain is caused by manipulation by some staff and a lack of sophisticated fiscal management by other staff. Though I can't figure out who is who :(

 

Attached are the reserve projections from last year's and this year's budget. As I hope you can see, the amounts vary and are always above the standard. Though the million or so unrestricted dollars represented by the few percentage points above standard are not that much in a 400 million dollar budget, it is a lot to the student who lost a librarian or counselor.

 

I continue to look for the aspect and presentation of this complex process that might hook the wider community and the alternative media into questioning the budget assumptions (having given up on the Bee after I dropped off all the research last year and never even got an e-mail in response :(.

 

Could the reserves by a possibility. The restricted reserves (4390 site carryover) remain another - though more complex - possibility due to their size at more than 20 M and the possibility of being swept back to the district budget.

 

Thanks again for helping with the search,

 

L'eo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Good morning,

 

My thanks to everyone for their helpful comments and support in many different ways. Lori especially provided a wonderful letter which she graciously allowed me to read during public comment (perhaps, Lori, you could consider having Mariellen post it at scusdobserver). I have attached the revised handout I provided to the board and community.

 

The board passed the budget for 2010-2011 with minimal review. Once again a staff powerpoint, not shared until the meeting, was the main focus. The actual budget was not made available to the public at the meeting. It is posted so all it would have taken is a click or two and it could have been on the public screens and available on the Serna Center wireless (which has guest access if one earns the password :). FCMAT has a free software program which makes the SACS budget

searchable. A real review would not be all that hard.

 

Instead the board continues to accept last minute powerpoints to inform their decisions. I have attached an annotated summary of staff powerpoints in an effort to understand their budget process. Research indicates that complex challenges often result in erroneous oversimplification of our responses. Perhaps this is the board's collective comfort zone. Staff certainly reinforces this by stating that the state format is very difficult to understand. So are many aspects of what is taught and mastered each day in our classrooms. The board needs to find its collective learning zone.

 

I will be making an agenda request to the board for a discussion of the line by line review workshop and the reestablishment of the budget committee for ongoing budget monitoring.

 

However, given the deeply wounding nature of these cuts, I think that the community needs to create its own budget committee to start the line by line. We could do this through a combination of meetings and the Internet. Maybe even a website :). We could publicly report our findings during public comment at board meetings. Regulations require public access to the electronic version of the actual budget but I and others have not been able to achieve this goal. We are stuck with the labor intensive paper route (Thanks Karen). Perhaps someone has thoughts on how to accomplish these foundational steps.

 

Perhaps a starting point in a line by line could be the 1.6 M in extra unrestricted reserves the board approved last night. The state has discussed allowing reserves to drop to 1% as a response to its diminished funding. Why are we making a reserve higher than the required 2% a priority over student need?.

 

The purpose of reserves is to provide a safety net for a crisis. At the meeting moving stories where again shared concerning the impact of the budget cuts. A librarian and a psychologist added to what counselors and classified staff shared at the previous meeting I attended. I think we are there in terms of the crisis for our students and teachers

 

Take care,

L'eo

 

916 307-8525

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

SCUSD 4390 Shuffle

Parent Budget Debate L'eo Bennett-Cauchon 6-19-10

 

SCUSD More Budget Reasoning

Parent Budget Debate L'eo Bennett-Cauchon 6-19-10

 
  

SCUSD 10-11 Budget Handout 2[1]

Parent Budget Debate L'eo Bennett-Cauchon 6-19-10

 
SCUSD Unrestricted

Parent Budget Debate L'eo Bennett-Cauchon 6-19-10

  

Parent Budget Debate:

SCUSD reserves 6-18-10 Leo Bennett-Cauchon 

SCUSD General Fund Spending Trends 12 years

 
  

SCUSD 10-11 Budget Handout 2.

 

 

SCUSD Budget Reasoning 6-17-10 

 

 
   
 
 
 

Board of Education Meeting June 17, 2010

Budget Debate

Hi all,

I hope folks are able to attend the board meeting tomorrow night. Participation in the public hearing on the budget is once again needed. So perhaps you could invite your friends and others. The budget documents were posted Tuesday morning so I am sorry that there will not be an exhaustive analysis this year. This makes my wife happy :)

I have attached a two page handout which has some information and a budget format with which to dream. In my opinion the current budget proposal does not reflect reality. A 20 million dollar increase in books and supplies is once again budgeted for this year even though there is no time left to spend it and the auditor moves this into our reserves year after year (but it does make our starting balance for next year 20 million dollars lower :(

SCUSD district is also budgeting for a decrease in local revenue and in non stimulus federal revenue for next year; as well an increase to15 M in transfers out of the general fund. To me this looks like the "hide the money" approach continues.

I remember a quote from my first SSC training here in Sacramento: “Don’t tell me where your priorities are. Show me where you spend your money and I’ll tell you what they are.” 
(James W. Fitzpatrick of Notre Dame University at SCUSD SPSA training)

I will continue to urge the board to follow up tomorrow's budget adoption with a line by line review workshop as was done in San Diego last year. They also have Coherent Governance there so perhaps such a review could be a good next step in the Board's desire to focus on priority concerns. In the context of the much lower actual spending cuts (see attached) there are many other options besides staff cuts.

Peace,

Leo
916 307-8525
 
 
SCUSD 10-11 Budget Handout
 
 
 
 
SCUSD General Fund Spending Trends 12 years
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

SCUSD Summer of Service

 
SCUSD Summer of Service
For: Space for 500 incoming 9th Graders
Contact: 
Zenae Scott, Youth Development Support Services 643-9430
youthdevelopment@sac-city.k12.ca.us
  
 
 
 

Teachers get schooled

Sacramento city superintendent gives the union a hard lesson in media management

By Cosmo Garvin 
cosmog@newsreview.com
More stories by this author... 

This article was published on 06.10.10.

New Superintendent Jonathan Raymond (right) was lauded by the Sacramento County grand jury. But the jury didn’t contact anyone from the SCTA for the union’s side of the story.
PHOTO BY LILLY FUENTES-JOY

Note to Sacramento labor leaders: If you want to badly lose a public-relations battle, just follow the Sacramento City Teachers Association’s example. The teachers union has been hammered by local media for refusing to give up pay and benefits in order to save teacher jobs.

Sacramento City Unified School District’s Jonathan Raymond, in his first job as school superintendent, has worked press and public opinion like a pro. He says that 250 district teachers will lose their jobs if the union doesn’t make concessions. He’s hired a new “chief communications officer” to help get his point across, to the media and to district employees. And the local press, The Sacramento Bee in particular, has helped Raymond amplify the message that any layoffs will be laid at SCTA’s feet. One Bee cartoon even portrayed a union official driving a bus over a group of young teachers. Ouch.

The SCTA’s rep was further damaged when a Sacramento County grand jury last month blasted the union and praised Raymond. “Superintendent Raymond has an excellent plan to resolve longstanding educational problems in the district and needs the support of the community to accomplish his goals,” the report reads. It goes on to say, “It is time for unions to become more of an advocate for children.”

Meanwhile, SCTA President Linda Tuttle is rarely quoted in stories, either because she couldn’t be reached or didn’t return calls. Perhaps she’d forgotten PR rule No. 1: If you want to look really bad in the press, don’t talk to the press.

She did agree to talk to SN&R however, perhaps feeling that the local alternative-weekly would be more labor-friendly. And it turns out that the SCTA actually does have an alternative plan—which the union claims will save $4.3 million and help prevent teacher layoffs.

State budget cuts, along with declining enrollment in the district, have produced a $31 million budget shortfall this year. The SCUSD board of trustees is expected to vote on its budget June 17; as things stand now, about 243 Sacramento city teachers and counselors won’t be returning next year.

The union representing classified employees—bus drivers, office staff and teacher assistants, among many others—have agreed to make concessions, including several furlough days. And Raymond says he plans to cut administrator costs by $6 million. Now, the district is asking for $3 million to $5 million worth of concessions from the teachers union.

One proposal is for three unpaid furlough days for teachers, something the SCTA is bitterly opposed to. The district also wants teachers to pay higher co-pays for doctor visits and prescription; the typical co-pay is just $5.

But the union points out that Sacramento city teachers make less money than teachers in surrounding districts. They’ve opted instead for better benefits during contract negotiations over the years.

City teachers already rank low compared to those in 20 similar-sized California districts. For teachers with 10 years on the job, Sacramento teachers ranked last in pay and benefits. Fresno, Elk Grove and Stockton teachers all did better.

SCTA President Tuttle says the district could save jobs by diverting funds used for extra-duty pay—stipends for coaching sports or managing the school yearbook—back into salaries. Teachers who perform extra duty would receive credit toward the annually required 18 hours of “professional development.”

Tuttle says the district could also save money by cutting back the number of meetings and trainings held during school hours. Teachers are required to report to weekly meetings, called “common planning time,” and the district often pays substitutes to fill in during those hours.

Linda Tuttle, president of the Sacramento City Teachers Association, has been losing the PR battle against new Superintendent Jonathan Raymond.
PHOTO BY LILLY FUENTES-JOY

“Why is it that the only option is furloughs and co-pays? We’ve got a lot of other ideas before we go there,” Tuttle said. “But there’s been no willingness even to consider any of these options.”

Instead, earlier this year, Raymond tried to get the state Public Employment Relation Board to declare an “impasse” in labor negotiations, even though the teacher’s contract technically isn’t up for renegotiation until next year. But PERB rejected the district’s request, leaving both sides stuck.

“As much as they think we’re entrenched, we think they’re entrenched,” Tuttle explained.

Still, Tuttle and Raymond were due to meet informally earlier this week. And Raymond told SN&R he’ll listen to the union’s proposals. “I think looking at the common-planning time is viable. But so are three furlough days. We can look at those things, but it’s going to take working together to find some common ground,” Raymond said.

It seems unlikely the union and district will find enough common ground to save every job, though. “Probably, some jobs will be gone,” Tuttle explained, noting that district enrollment is down to 43,000 students, from a high of 52,000 a few years ago. “Sure we could say furloughs for everyone, and try to keep the maximum number of jobs, and keep those union dues coming in. But we’ll just be back in the same place next year.”

Teachers certainly aren’t unanimous on the issues of furloughs or co-pays. One teacher, who asked her name not be used in this story, explained it this way: “I’ve heard a lot of teachers say, ‘Yeah, I’ll do furloughs if it will save young teachers’ jobs.’ But when those young teachers are old crusty teachers like me, I want them to have good pay and benefits, too.”

High-school teacher Lori Jablonski, recently elected to serve on the SCTA board of representatives, said she would be happy to donate some of her pay to help save jobs, something else that has been discussed within the union. But she said it would be a mistake to start imposing furloughs now.

“Honestly, we think it’s bad for kids. Shaving off three days this year, and maybe three days next year. It’s a race to the bottom,” said Jablonski.

Jablonski was elected to the union board as part of a slate of candidates calling themselves REAL teachers—Responsive Experienced Accountable Leadership. She said they ran partly because they felt the union was not being effective in communicating with the public. “I think we were getting frustrated with a union that was acting a little overwhelmed and reactive,” she said.

That’s in contrast to superintendent Raymond, who’s been much better at the PR game. One of the first things he did was to hire a $100,000 salary chief of staff. Then, he beefed up the district’s public-relations department and created the position of “chief communications officer,” a $114,000 a year job. (Raymond is quick to point out that those positions were funded by eliminating other high-paid positions, such as chief financial officer.)

Raymond is a former Republican congressional candidate from Massachusetts but has a fairly brief work history in public schools. From 2006 to 2008, he was “chief accountability officer” in the Charlotte Mecklenburg school district in North Carolina. But he never dealt with labor issues there. And North Carolina is a “right to work” state with a teachers association that has considerably less clout than California teacher unions.

Raymond got his training as a superintendent from the Broad Superintendents Academy, funded by The Broad Foundation, a proponent of the charter-schools movement, and that’s put some teachers on their guard.

Teachers were certainly suspicious after the release of a report by a Sacramento County grand jury, which was largely laudatory of Raymond and highly critical of the SCTA. The report, “Last Chance to Put Children First,” got a lot of play in the press. And many teachers noted the title was quite similar to Raymond’s own vision statement, “Putting Children First,” which he released last September.

School district officials said no one in the district’s central office initiated the grand-jury complaint, and that Raymond had not been in contact with the grand jury. Tuttle said the grand jury didn’t contact her or anyone else in union leadership to get their side of the story, either.

This has been par for the course for Tuttle and the SCTA, still trying to catch up in the public-relations game.

 
 
 

 

A Message from

Joe Sison

DAC Vice Chair

 

 

Dear DAC Parents.   (for feedback, please respond directly to Joe Sison at:  sison.joseph@gmail.com) 

 

Thank you so much for forwarding my email to your classroom parents regarding possible recommendations for changes to the district's calendar for the next 3 years.  I received over  70 responses and I forwarded everyone's comments to the Calendar Committee.  Overall there was near-unanimous agreement from those who gave me feedback for a Thanksgiving Week off.  The other options were overall split in half.  There is a meeting scheduled with collective bargaining in the district and the issues you responded to will also be part of the discussion.  Once I hear more of the results, I will email everyone.

 

I am also on another committee that convened today per the request of the superintendent:  Fingerprinting Committee.  This committee is looking at the fingerprinting process in the district.    There are at least three issues related to parents and below are some comments that came up during the meeting:

 

      Many parents feel that the cost of fingerprinting ($59.00/fingerprinting) is cost-prohibitive and may be a hurdle for some to volunteer and engage at the school-site level.

a.       Consider fully subsidizing some parents.  One criteria would be to make it free for parents whose children meet criteria for the "Free and Reduced Lunch Program."

 

b.      For those parents who don't meet criteria for the "Free and Reduced Lunch Programs," but who may still be having financial hardship to afford the fingerprinting fee, they may apply for some sort of "fee waiver/scholarship."  -- process will be "to be determined."  Any comments regarding this "to be determined process" will be helpful.

 

c.       Decreasing the fee from $59.00 to $47.00 for parent volunteers (which is the actual cost to the district for the FBI and DOJ checks).

 

2.       Many parents would like to have a more convenient way to be fingerprinted.  Currently, fingerprinting is only at the Serna Center and on certain hours as the machine involved is stationary. 

 

a.       Allow fingerprinting during district-wide events, such as Passport to Success, Open Enrollment events, etc.

b.      Consider purchasing a "mobile unit" so the fingerprinting staff can go to individual school sites.

 

3.       Currently there are 3 tiers of volunteers:  1st tier are for parents who volunteer off campus (i.e. baking cookies for "cookie sales," correcting papers at home, typing up reports at home, etc.); A 2nd tier exists where parents volunteer "onsite"/on campus and work with students in the classroom, "supervised" by the teacher, though are free to work individually with the students with the teacher present in the classroom.  The 3rd tier are parents who are also on campus volunteers and go on field trips, etc. and who may have "alone" time with students during outings, school events, etc.  This also applies to volunteers who may be providing individual or group tutoring for kids.

 

a.       Currently only tier 3 is required fingerprinting.   Tier 1 clearly does not need fingerprinting as there is no contact with students at all.  Tier 3 requires fingerprinting because of the possibility that the parent volunteer may be alone with students at some point during the event involved.  The "grey area" appears to be "Tier 2" where the parent volunteer has direct contact with the students while the teacher is present in the classroom.  Some parents have expressed concerns that the "Tier 2" parents should also be fingerprinted.

 

The committee will meet again next week.  I would like to get as many feedback as I can related to these issues.  In particular, comment on whether you as a  parent would become more active in the school-site if the fingerprinting cost was less, more convenient, etc.  Also, please comment on your thoughts regarding whether Tier 2 should be fingerprint required or not. 

 

Thanks again for your help.  I will bring everyone's comments to the committee next week.

 

Joe Sison

DAC Vice Chair  

 

 

 

Superintendent Jonathan P. Raymond  
 
 
Invites you to attend the
Grand Opening of the Parent Resource Center
 
 
 
The flier is available below in Chinese, Hmong, Russian, Spanish and Vietnamese  
 
Chinese
 
Hmong
 
Russian
 
Spanish
 
Vietnamese 
 
 

 

 

Manuel Guillot
Director, Parent & Community Engagement Office

 

 Wanda Yañez, DAC Chair

Dear Colleague:
 
Please join Superintendent Jonathan Raymond for the Grand Opening of the District's Parent Resource Center (PRC) on Tuesday, May 25th.  The PRC is designed to provide families with resources, and information to help support their children's education and become effective partners with our schools.
 
Among the services PRC provides includes meeting room facilities, computer stations, a lending library, workshops, training, and presentations on parenting, parent-child learning, and other topics,  walk-in health counseling, and links to city, state and community resources.  The PRC also houses the Parent-Teacher Home Visit Project.     
 
The event will start promptly at 3:30 p.m. with a special program (press-conference) and a ribbon cutting ceremony. This will be followed by an Open House Celebration starting at 4:00 p.m. Food, soft drinks, health and education materials will be provided.
 
We have already informed all the schools, but it would be greatly appreciated if you can assist us in getting the word out to the families you serve.  The flier is available in English, Chinese, Hmong, Russian, Spanish and Vietnamese.   
 
If you have any questions, please call Pat La Marr at 643-9260.
 
Thank you,
 
Manuel Guillot
Director, Parent & Community Engagement Office

Hello DAC Membership & interested parties:

 

You are invited to come to the

 

Parent Resource Center’s Open House on Tuesday, May 25th from 3:30 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. for the

 

Special Program and Ribbon Cutting and from 4:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. Open House Celebration.

 

 

A few workshops and services that the Parent Resource Center plans to offer are:  

 

-Information and Referral Services

 

- Health Education and Assessment

 

- Workshop Presentations (sign language, Foster Parenting Training, Parenting Skills, Job opportunities).

 

-  Discussion Groups and Support groups

 

- Story hour for children

 

- Literacy assistance for adults

 

- Volunteer opportunities

 

Wanda Yañez, DAC Chair

 
 
 
 

Parent Conference - The Healthy Family

~ THE HEALTHY FAMILY ~
15 Things that Makes a Family Healthy!
Wednesday May 19, 2010
8:30am Registration/Breakfast, 9:30am-2:30pm Workshop/Lunch
Click here for more information
 
 
 
 
 


 

 

  Raley's Reach: Nomination Golden Empire Elem. School Students & Families

 

Vote for Golden Empire @ Raley's Reach: Nomination

We Want to Eat Healthy With Our Improved “Healthy Eating Garden.”
Who will Benefit?
Golden Empire Elem. School Students & Families
How will the $7,500 be used?
Golden Empire School is a large elementary school with 600 students. We currently have a small school garden, but our vision is to increase the size & scope of the garden to create a “Healthy Eating Garden.” As we are an urban school with many needs, many of our students do not have the opportunity to enjoy fresh fruits and vegetables. They do not always get the chance to make healthy eating choices. With the help of the Raley’s Reach program it is our hope to increase the size of our garden, add new planting areas & plant fruits, vegetables & fruit trees to make our Healthy Eating Garden a reality. Our school garden has become a gathering place for students & parents to foster community involvement. It is rewarding to hear students talk about healthy eating & trying a new vegetable they have never tasted before. With the ability to enlarge & develop our garden, teachers will instruct students on how a garden develops & help beautify their concrete neighborhood.
Submitted By:
ieister, Sacramento
 
Other SCUSD Nominations
 
A mentoring education program meeting physical, mental, & emotional needs.

Who will Benefit?
Oak Ridge Elementary School & partner Equal Start

How will the $7,500 be used? 
Equal Start is divided into 4 major categories. Extra Mile Run Hundreds of runners at the California International Marathon raise awareness and funding for health care by running on behalf of a child. Health care enrollment increased from 12% to 82% in the 08/09 school year. Be Change Run Club Be Change is an after-school fitness and nutrition program for Oak Ridge children. More than 60 children participated last year, with 20 elites traveling to University of Oregon and Nike on the annual “I Never” trip. Excel Literacy Programs Knowing that reading is the foundation of all academic success, EXCEL targets children who are currently below the California standard. With one-on-one mentors, the student’s STAR test scores continue to rise. UACF: Mental Health Our partnership with United Advocates for Children and Families, provides on-campus acute counseling. Our goal is to provide every child with a mental health assessment and on-going acute care.

Submitted By: 
equalstart, 
 
After-School Enrichment Program

Who will Benefit?
students at Phoebe Hearst Elementary School

How will the $7,500 be used? 
The "media broadcast/Journalism class" is proposed as an after-school enrichment program to students at Phoebe Hearst Elem. School where students will learn the fundamental elements of journalism (who, what, where, when and why); familiarize them with various forms of broadcast equipment that will include computers, printers, video cameras, audio/video mixers as well as lighting techniques and software programs; and introduce them to typical broadcast terminology. As part of the class students will create and publish a school newspaper, broadcast videos, documentaries on school/current events and curriculum projects. The current budget cut reductions for public schools does not allow for this type of purchase. The class will begin in September 2010 and provide students an opportunity to enhance their reading, writing and oral language skills and more specifically teach students to identify, research and report facts in a variety of ways. This project will benefit the entire school.

Submitted By: 
juliedelagua, sacramento
 
Bringing the Renaissance arts alive

Who will Benefit?
K-8 students of Leonardo da Vinci K-8 school

How will the $7,500 be used? 
In celebration of the time of Leonardo da Vinci, the students step back into time and experience the science and art of the renaissance. Under the eyes of the queen and her court, students study: painting; the science of flight; handwriting with quill pens; using a camera obscura; as well as the historical arts of blacksmithery; weaving; pot throwing; candlemaking and sword fighting. Middle school students take on the persona of an historical figure from their studies and share their knowledge with other students. This event broadens the learning experience of students kindergarten through eighth grade taking learning outside of books and paper. Heightened understanding of the dawning of arts and science and the application to our present day encourages students to wonder what if...and dream as Leonardo did.

Submitted By: 
dianes, sacramento
 
Celebrate Cultural Diversity: Using Literacy & the Arts at Family Fun Night

Who will Benefit?
Students and families of Mark Twain School

How will the $7,500 be used? 
Understanding & sensitivity to the uniqueness of cultures in communities just doesn’t happen, it has to be planned. The overarching goal of this Raley’s Reach project is to develop positive beliefs & attitudes about culture & community life. This project will serve students/families of Mark Twain School. This project will use $7,500: 1) to plan & coordinate (4) Family Fun Nights highlighting 10-15 cultures through hands-on art activities, customs, stories/oral history, stage performances, make & take projects, cultural displays & live dance & music. The project will seek a diversity of local cultural groups/artists & professional talent; 2) to purchase multi-cultural books & videos for Youth & Family Resource Center w/ on-going Culture Club to create foundational learning about culture. Guest speakers will be invited; 3) A multi-cultural dinner will be held to celebrate those who embraced diversity. A Photo Voice project will be on display at dinner & will capture reflections & memorie

Submitted By: 
Fun Cater, Sacramento
 
I would like to help those with disabilities.

Who will Benefit?
John F. Kennedy School

How will the $7,500 be used? 
J.F.K. School is a school that is a segregated school for children w/ developmental disablities that are aggressive. I know that California's education system is facing some serious cuts and this would be a way to make up for some of those cuts. The school is getting ready to get a makeover and I know that they are hoping to get enough money for some of the different therapies they offer the children,such as sensory rooms,regional special olympics are held there, adaptive P.E. and many, many other services that theses children and young adults need to become a productive part of society and they need all the help and support they can get. Construction is supposed to start this spring/summer and hopeful only take about a year and this money would help make-up for any short falls.

Submitted By: 
aj, Modesto
 
 
School Cuts = Less School Supplies, Fewer Assemblies & Programs, and 0 Fun!

Who will Benefit?
The 440 students at Pony Express Elementary School

How will the $7,500 be used? 
PTA at Pony Express is a small but dedicated group devoted to bringing enrichment to our school at which 50% of the students live at or below the poverty line. Our goal is to help enrich the lives of our students by exposing them to events that promote cultural, environmental, and academic understanding–events ranging from bringing a dairy cow to campus, inviting a poet to come and teach kids how to create their own poetry, and bringing African musicians and dancers to perform and talk about the origins of their art. Due to the economy, our PTA fell short of our fundraising goals this year, which will severely limit the amount of assemblies we will be able to bring to our school next year. Also, with the school budget cuts ahead, PTA will surely be called upon to help with necessary school supplies and program cut assistance for the next school year. If our PTA were to receive the $7,500, we would be able to continue providing quality enrichment for our school. Dates 9/2010-6/2011

Submitted By: 
seid,
Editors Note: Golden Empire is my neighborhood school. I love the teachers and the Principal. Principal Irene Eister sent me the info for this article. I know you love your school... so vote, we need the money.

 
 
 
 

Sacramento superintendent to meet with Hmong, Mien, Lao families

Published: Friday, May. 14, 2010 - 3:45 pm

Sacramento's Hmong, Mien, and Lao communities will have a chance Tuesday to talk to Sacramento City Unified School District Superintendent Jonathan Raymond.

The superintendent will discuss how the district plans to support their children's education for the next several years. Interpreters and free food will be provided.

The discussion is put on by the Hmong, Mien, and Lao Community Action Network (HMLCAN) General Meeting and will take place from 5 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the George Sims Community Center, 6207 Logan Street, Sacramento.

For more information, email France Vu at info@hmongwomenheritage.org or call 916/394-1405.



Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/05/14/2751786/sacramento-superintendent-to-meet.html#ixzz0nwsM1w00 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

The following email went out to selected staff at SCUSD on Friday April 9, 2010:

Congratulations! On behalf of SCUSD, we are pleased to inform you that you are one of a select few outstanding teachers eligible for an exciting new district program – the Talent Transfer Initiative (TTI).
The Talent Transfer Initiative is a highly selective, federally funded initiative that recognizes current SCUSD teachers who have a track record of contributing to student achievement gains by offering them the opportunity to take on a new challenge by using their skills in high-needs schools – where they are needed most and can have the most profound impact. If you choose to transfer to a participating SCUSD school, you will be eligible to receive $20,000 over a two-year period in recognition of the adjustment that comes with taking on a new position, as well as for the potential tremendous impact you can take at your new school. This research study is funded by the U.S. Department of Education; participation requires no expenditure whatsoever of district funds.
For more information about the Talent Transfer Initiative, including an overview of the program, benefits, and frequently asked question, visit www.talenttransferintiative.org. To access available information about SCUSD, use this password information:
Username: xxxxxx
Password: xxxxx
Coral A. Jenrette, Program Manager for the Talent Transfer Initiative, will contact you directly to invite you to the reception being held in your honor on April 19. She will also send you the unique username and password you will need to complete the online application (deadline is April 27). Please feel free to reach out to her with any questions at coral@talenttransferinitiative.org or (800) 688-6983 ext 3.
SCUSD is looking forward to working with you to help our students succeed.
Sincerely,

Mary Shelton
Acting Chief Academic Officer
Sacramento City Unified School District

Go to the All New SCUSD Observer Web Site

 
 
 

 

Wells Fargo donates books to elementary schools

Published: Wednesday, Apr. 14, 2010 - 9:44 am

Wells Fargo is donating 1,000 books to elementary school students in the Sacramento City Unified School District this morning as part of the Reading First program.

The books are being delivered to the Sequoia Elementary School Library, where Wells Fargo employees will read to kindergarten and second-grade students.

The donated books include "Llama Llama Red Pajama" and "I Will Never Not Eat a Tomato." The Wells Fargo reading program has donated more than one million books to classrooms.

"We want our kids to love books and love reading because early literacy is a key to high academic achievement," said Raymond in a press release. "I commend Wells Fargo for its support of the district and interest in the literacy of our children. These books help us toward our goal of preparing every child for college or a career."



Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/04/14/2678261/wells-fargo-donates-books-to-elementary.html#mi_rss=Education#ixzz0l61yxpP7 

 

 
 
 

Sac City's contract move surprises teachers union

 
Published: Thursday, Apr. 8, 2010 - 10:14 pm

Sacramento City Teachers Association officials said they were caught off guard Thursday by the Sacramento City Unified School District's decision to make its concessions proposal public.

The district presented a list of concessions -- including three furlough days -- for the teachers union at Thursday's board meeting, which trustees approved unanimously. Making the proposal public -- or "sunshining" it -- is the first step toward declaring an impasse. Should that happen, a state mediator would be assigned to help resolve issues.

The union contends that its contract does not expire until the summer of 2011. District lawyers say they found language that allows them to open it early.

Many teachers at the board meeting were dismayed when the district did not discuss the proposals specifically, instead relying on a memo sent out the previous day.

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/04/08/2666251/sac-citys-contract-move-surprises.html#ixzz0kc839Udq

  lorijab wrote on 04/09/2010 06:49:01 AM:

Thanks to JoeBarnett and Gordon1 ...obviously, what's going on is the district's attempt at hardball negotiating; but none of us should lose sight of the fact that the issues are the result of irresponsible policies at every governmental level--yes, including years of short-sighted decisionmaking made by this school district--that teachers and frontline school staff have been forced to suck up for years. SCTA and its members are committed to finding significant cost-savings solutions. But because these issues involve our kids, their education and the need to look out for long-term integrity of the teaching profession they are difficult...and why should they be otherwise? Easy solutions got us into this mess. Kicking teachers has become the favorite sport of hack politicians, Dem and Rep alike...and teachers and allies of public education are beginning to step up and defend themselves from this cheap political onslaught. This Superintendent and the board need to be very mindful that they don't succumb to the easy lure of such lazy politics...too much is at stake and increasingly its clear that the people of Sacramento won't stand for it.

Reply to this Comment Recommended (2)  Report abuse

 

 ryanrenee wrote on 04/08/2010 11:57:35 PM:

progressiveD - you must be living in another state. CA spends just over $8000 per student each year. We are ranked 46th out of 50 in per pupil expenditures. Nice to know 4 other states are doing worse than we are...

Reply to this Comment Recommend (0)  Report abuse

 

 gordon1 wrote on 04/08/2010 11:37:22 PM:

What kind of labor relations is this? Request a contract opener and then immediately announce that the intention is to seek a declaration of impasse on the same day? I had always understood that negotiations required an effort on both sides to proceed in good faith.

Reply to this Comment Recommended (2)  Report abuse

 

 bbbbmer5th wrote on 04/08/2010 11:13:34 PM:

Replying to progressiveD (04/08/2010 11:07:17 PM):
"Nice to see the teacher's union work so hard for the kids. The second highest payroll for teachers in the nation and no cuts in pay. They act like they are helping when they give up a raise. Sorry, that's just not enough for the taxpayers that have had their pay cut or lost their jobs.

It is time to use the $12.000 a student we are paying for education and invoke a voucher system.. Let every student choose from traditional, charter and private schools and see which one draws the most...":

You antiunion jerks just make up bull**** to suit your point of view. Sacramento's teacher pay is above, oh, say, Beverly Hills??? or Greenwich, Connecticut??? or Short Hills, New Jersey??? or anyone of THOUSANDS of districts around the nation??? You union busters are just plain old LIARS, and apparently you aren't all that good at statistical comparisons either -- or supporting your ridiculousness w

Reply to this Comment Recommended (3)  Report abuse

 

 JoeBarnett wrote on 04/08/2010 11:11:46 PM:

The district still has not identified what language they think allows them to void the existing provisions of the contract. The problem with the three furlough days is the district keeps hiring six figure administrative employees. If 150 teachers went on a three day furlough, that would only cover one of the recent administrative hires. A non teacher union representative also complained about the district acting unfairly and decietfully in getting them to concede on their contract.

It is as if the district forgot the rules in California...and started acting like we were without legal protections.. This could prove to be a very expensive mistake on the districts part.

Reply to this Comment Recommended (4)  Report abuse

 

 progressiveD wrote on 04/08/2010 11:07:17 PM:

Nice to see the teacher's union work so hard for the kids. The second highest payroll for teachers in the nation and no cuts in pay. They act like they are helping when they give up a raise. Sorry, that's just not enough for the taxpayers that have had their pay cut or lost their jobs.

It is time to use the $12.000 a student we are paying for education and invoke a voucher system.. Let every student choose from traditional, charter and private schools and see which one draws the most students. If we just made the vouchers $9,000 a piece we could save $3,000 a student and get them a better education.



Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/04/08/2666251/sac-citys-contract-move-surprises.html#ixzz0kc8K6wW9

 
 

 
  

THE STATE OF BLACK STUDENTS' EDUCATION

In the Sacramento City Unified School District Black Parallel School Board’s “Call to Action”

Research Report

2008-2009  

 

Return to Top of Page  


California State Action Plan for

School, Family,and Community Partnerships

Draft Revision November 17, 2009

 

 

 

Return to Top of Page 

 



American Indian Education Program

Parent & Youth Leadership Conference

 

 

 

SCUSD PARENT INFORMATION EXCHANGE

(PIE) 2009/2010

 

 

 

 Return to Top of Page 

 


Sacramento City Educational Foundation (SCEF)

 

 

Fund Raising

Donations

Plus+Grants

Program Goals & Results

Staffing & Organization

 

 

 

 

 
Donating & getting funds for classrooms!

 

http://www.donorschoose.org/ 

 

New Money for Teachers!


Ms. Roberts teaches at Woodbine Elementary School in Sacramento, where 92% of the students qualify for free and reduced price lunches. Despite the challenges, she is determined to bring the best educational experience possible to her second graders, including teaching these eager young minds about the importance of taking care of the environment. So, Ms. Roberts turned to DonorsChoose.org and requested a worm farm to help foster the students’ love of gardening, science and helping the earth.

Donors pitched in and funded her project and, if you are a public school teacher, they can help fund your project too. By submitting projects on DonorsChoose.org, Ms. Roberts has since been able to add whiteboards and math manipulatives to her classroom, thanks to the individuals who chose to bring these projects to life for her students! The teacher noted that the donors “have given [her students] an opportunity to actively participate in lessons and be creative. These materials will be used for many years in my classroom.”

Now is the perfect time to request resources for your classroom, as DonorsChoose.org is working with the Sacramento City Educational Foundation (SCEF) to support teachers and students in the Sacramento City Unified School District. Just in time for the back to school season, SCEF will match donations from the public for selected classroom projects in the district, meaning that your classroom needs are that much more likely to be met!

SCEF is a volunteer-led, nonprofit organization dedicated to increasing resources for students in the Sacramento City Unified School District. The purpose of these grants is to enhance student achievement and educational opportunities in innovative ways. If you are a public school teacher, visitwww.donorschoose.org/teachers to get started!   

It’s easy to support your local schools!

DonorsChoose.org makes it really simple and fun to help classrooms right in your own backyard. Through this person to person philanthropy website, individuals can check out teachers’ wish lists – from calculators to classic novels – and choose which classroom project they want to support. Donors can contribute as little as $1 to help bring dedicated and innovative teachers’ ideas to life. After completing a project, you will hear back from the classroom you supported with photographs and thank you notes.

This back to school season, DonorsChoose.org is partnering with the Sacramento City Educational Foundation (SCEF) to support schools right in your neighborhood. SCEF will provide 50% of the funding for selected classroom projects in SCUSD, making it even easier for you to make a difference in your community. The support of the SCEF comes at a critical time, when Sacramento teachers and students are lacking essential classroom supplies due to severe budget constraints. You can make a huge difference for teachers and students without having to break your own budget.

To date, over 100,000 public and charter school teachers have used the site to secure funding for more than $35 million in books, supplies, technology, and other resources that their students need to learn. Through www.DonorsChoose.org, individuals from all walks of life have helped over 2 million students from low-income families. To support teachers and students in the Sacramento City Unified School District, visitwww.donorschoose.org.

DonorsChoose.org contact: Candice Chesson, West Region Associate Director, candice@donorschoose.org 

Sacramento City Educational Foundation contact: Alice Levine, harroun53@aol.com  -or-  Larkin Penrose, LJPenrose@att.net

 

 Return to Top of Page 


 

  A Look at Community Schools

 

Read the full report (pdf)

 

Download the executive summary (pdf)

 

Interactive Map: Profiles of Community Schools

 

Video: A Primer on Community Schools

 

Event: With Tony Blair, Sec. Arne Duncan, Rep. Steny Hoyer, and others

 

Children living in poverty face many obstacles outside the classroom that can hinder their success in the classroom. Unaddressed health care needs interfere with learning and cause low attendance. Inadequate and inconsistent housing may deprive students of a safe and quiet place to study. A lack of affordable and accessible child care forces many young adults to sacrifice learning opportunities to care for younger family members. And poverty’s economic stress may cause students to be less engaged and parents to be less involved in their children’s education.

 

The advent of accountability-based school reform has pushed many high-poverty schools to focus on providing effective instruction and meeting high academic standards. Numerous schools have made progress in these areas but few have been adequately equipped with the tools needed to confront external learning obstacles related to poverty.

 

A small but growing number of “community schools” have bridged the gap between the provision of antipoverty services and an excellent academic program. They capitalize on the school’s physical space and access to students and families in order to deliver much-needed services in a central, accessible location. Community schools partner with nonprofits and local agencies to provide students with health care, academic enrichment, mental and behavioral health services, and other youth development activities without burdening school staff.

 

Community school partnerships can complement proven school improvement strategies—effective teachers, challenging curriculum, and expanded learning time. These partnerships also allow teachers, principals, and staff to concentrate on what’s happening in the classroom with the knowledge that students’ “outside” needs are being addressed.

 

And community schools involve adults through adult education classes and onsite social services. By extending school hours and enlarging the school’s role in the surrounding community, community schools can become a hub for community-building activity while continually providing students with a strong academic program.

 

Recent evaluations of community schools throughout the country demonstrate that schools that integrate student services and a high-quality educational experience have a positive effect on students and their families in a variety of areas including student achieve- ment, school attendance, and parent involvement. Yet community schools differ greatly in the type of services they provide and how much those services are integrated with academic instruction. Additional research can determine which aspects of community school models most effectively improve student achievement.

 

The success of current community school initiatives, the urgent needs of students living in poverty, and the potential of community schools to increase student achievement point toward stronger federal support for the community school strategy. We need not look far for examples of national community school policy—England has committed to transform all of its 23,000 schools into extended schools (the term for community schools in England) by 2010.

 

This report will provide an overview of community school strategies in the United States and how community schools can decrease poverty’s detrimental effect on students. There are many examples of community school initiatives—from national models to local school district initiatives. This report highlights the examples where research shows community schools have had the most success. It will also review England’s extended school model and suggest how the United States can expand community schools based on England’s experience.

 

Although community schools in the United States are limited in number, lessons can be gleaned from some successful initiatives throughout the country.

 

  • Each community school needs a strong academic program at its center, no matter how comprehensive the nonacademic services are. Afterschool and all other extracurricular programming should complement the school’s central academic mission.
  •  
    Principals, teachers, and other staff must be trained and willing to collaborate with outside organizations in order to maximize learning.
  • Partnering nonprofits or agencies should dedicate an onsite employee of their organization as a full-time resource coordinator to operate as a contact point between the school and organization, students, parents, and other community members.
  • Parents, school staff, community members, and other stakeholders play an integral role in determining the services that are most in need at a community school. Parent and community involvement in planning a community school can ensure that services are utilized improve student outcomes.
  • Consistent, quality evaluations can help community schools determine the strengths and weaknesses of their services and programs and prevent schools from becoming stuck in nonproductive partnerships.

 

 

Read the full report (pdf)

 

Download the executive summary (pdf)

 

Interactive Map: Profiles of Community Schools

 

Video: A Primer on Community Schools

 

Event: With Tony Blair, Sec. Arne Duncan, Rep. Steny Hoyer, and others

To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact: 

Print: Suzi Emmerling (foreign policy and security, energy, education, immigration)
 
semmerling@americanprogress.org

 

Print: Jason Rahlan (health care, economy, civil rights, poverty)
 
jrahlan@americanprogress.org

 

Radio: John Neurohr
 
jneurohr@americanprogress.org

 

TV: Andrea Purse
 
apurse@americanprogress.org

 

Web: Erin Lindsay
 
elindsay@americanprogress.org

 

 

Center for American Progress

 

Return to Top of Page 

 


 


Family Engagement as a Shared Responsibility

 

Family involvement is a shared responsibility, consisting of three major dimensions: the opportunities that schools and communities offer parents and other family members to support and enrich their children's learning; mutually agreed upon, or co-constructed, roles; and learning from personal experiences, peers, research, and other resources about how to engage families in children's learning. In this issue, we apply our new, broader definition of family engagement to the ways in which families, communities, and schools work together to share responsibility for student learning.

Two new articles illustrate how co-constructed roles can work in practice: Voices from the field recounts the story of a parent, school principal, and family advocate sharing responsibility for creating a solution to a school problem, and our featured teaching case describes how a mother enlisted the help of a community organization to communicate with a school principal after her son was suspended. In addition, we introduce a tool to help school districts and other organizations think through the development of systemic family engagement policies and programs.
We also introduce a newly developed section of our website that houses all of Harvard Family Research Project's policy-related work in one convenient location. And, as always, we provide a listing of new family involvement articles, news, and resources.

 

 

Return to Top of Page 

 

 
 
 

Dear School and Community Leaders:

You are invited to join Superintendent Raymond's at a news conference to highlight parent engagement in our district and its importance in furthering student success. Superintendent Raymond will also announce that starting this year the district will annually celebrate Parent Engagement Week: Schools Partnering with Parents, and Communities for Student Success,  on the third week of November to thank parents  for their involvement and to underscore the importance they make in student achievement.  The week  also coincides with parent-teacher conferences taking place in most schools.  

Please join us at this very important press-conference.  If you have any questions, please call me at 643-7924
 

Manuel Guillot
Director
Parent Engagement Office

 
WHAT:  Press-Conference on Parent Engagement
WHEN:  Thursday, Nov. 19, 10:00 a.m.

Earl Warren Elementary School
5420 Lowell St.
Sacramento CA
Driving Directions
Click the map to open an interactive map in a new window.

http://www.scusd.edu/Pages/default.aspx

 


 
 
 
 

 
 

Californai Montessori Project

 

 

California Montessori Project Move from Old Marshall to Thomas Jefferson-FAQs

Old Marshall School Facility Assessment

 

 

Montessori Building Deemed Unfit
Sacramento Superintendent: Old Marshall School Doesn't Meet Standards

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Safety concerns will force students from the Capitol Campus of the California Montessori Project in Sacramento. Students moved into the Old Marshall School in August from a smaller church space. California Montessori Project leases the building from the Sacramento City Unified School District, which also oversees the charter school.

 

A top-to-bottom review found the midtown Sacramento building doesn't meet current state building codes or earthquake specifications for building safety, new Sacramento City Unified Superintendent Jonathan Raymond said.

Parents found that out Monday.

 

"They deemed the building unsafe enough for them to move. I don't understand why they didn't know that before the kids started school back in August," parent Michelle Dipinto said.

 

Raymond said the district failed to do a thorough review of the building before moving students.

 

"I don't think staff did a thorough job, and that was something that I uncovered when I started," Raymond said. "They were already in there, and it became apparent when we started to ask questions -- 'Why were they in before we did a thorough review?'"

 

He said there's no imminent danger to students; the building, Raymond said, is structurally sound. But it doesn't meet the higher standards set by California for buildings used for educational purposes.

 

"Irrespective of whether they're charter school children or Sacramento City Unified school children, they should be in a safe facility. All of our children should be safe," Raymond said.

 

California Montessori Project executive director Gary Bowman said the school will work with parents, teachers and the district to minimize any negative affect on students.

 

"We're going to make lemonade out of lemons here. Nobody likes a midyear relocation, but that's the hand that we've been dealt, and we truly believe we can help facilitate a remarkable outcome to this," Bowman said.

 

Several empty schools are being considered for the relocation, with Thomas Jefferson Elementary appearing to be the frontrunner. The move is expected to take place in December, over the winter break.

See full story and video on KCRA.com 

 

Return to Top of Page 

 

Parents split over possible Montessori school move
by Jonathan Mendick

 

A five-hour board meeting on the fate of California Montessori Project's Capitol Campus ended around 10:45 p.m. Monday night with a resolution: If an assessment says the Marshall School building in which the school resides is not compliant with state building codes, the school must move "expeditiously."

If the assessment, which has still not been made public, says the building does meet minimum state codes, the board will reconvene to decide if the school will move or not.

 

Nearly 100 people - parents, elementary school students and the California Montessori Project's nine board members, superintendent and a legal advisor - filled a multipurpose room at the Marshall School in Midtown to see if the school would need to move. They voiced a range of concerns, asked questions and offered suggestions to the board and its director.

 

The public charter grade school opened at its current location, 2700 G St., on Aug. 17, after eight years of being located in the Pioneer Congregational Church, 2700 L St.

California Montessori Project leases the Marshall School building from the Sacramento City Unified School District, which also oversees its charter.

Last week, parents received a letter from CMP superintendent Gary Bowman saying new SCUSD superintendent Jonathan Raymond had recently performed a study, deeming the building unsafe.

 

"I don't think (previous) staff did a thorough job, and that was something that I uncovered when I started," Raymond said to KCRA 3 last Tuesday. "(Students) were already in there, and we started to ask questions (like) 'Why were they in before we did a thorough review?'"

 

California public schools are required to pass strict earthquake standards designated in the 1933 Field Act, but since the Marshall School was built in 1903, it does not meet them.

"We know we don't have Field Act compliance, (because) we predated the Act by a number of years," said Bowman.

 

As a charter school, however, CMP only needs to meet minimum building requirements and not the Field Act. Their previous location, Pioneer Congregational Church, was not Field Act-compliant.

 

Bowman told those gathered Monday night that Raymond told him last week, "it's not your mistake, it's the city's mistake." He also said Raymond told him that "we will do everything we can to make it whole," and that he wants to meet again next Tuesday.

 

A CMP facilities team proposed Jefferson Elementary School, in the College Glen neighborhood, as the best fit for the school to lease. Several parents praised Jefferson's newer facilities, which include a larger grassy area for children to play, a more modern kitchen and a multipurpose room with a stage.

 

"In terms of the move itself, SCUSD is going to bring in packers, movers, they're going to go full tilt to support this move," Bowman added.

 

However, others felt skeptical of SCUSD's motives, shocked and betrayed at the sudden news.

 

"We felt that the building was safe enough," said Cécile Downs, the parent of a kindergartner and a second grader. "To my knowledge the school still has not received any written instructions to move."

 

Many parents voiced their concern that moving would disrupt students' education and take parent volunteer hours. Others alleged that the district wanted to rent out the Marshall School, which Bowman denied.

 

A number of parents demanded transportation to the new school it moves. Some said they would not be able to transport their children because it takes too long.

 

"This building is over a century old, and I don't believe there have been any problems related to earthquakes in this building," said Rich, a parent of a first grader who did not give his last name. "There is far more risk to our children driving on the freeway for two hours a day to get to a new location."

 

The Sacramento Press contacted SCUSD's public relations office manager Maria Lopez and asked if the Marshall School building violates any codes. She said the code is not the issue.

 

"Our superintendent said that no students should be in any structures not compliant with the Field Act," Lopez said. "There's a little bit of a grey area on whether independent charters (should) go into non-Field Act-compliant structures. Some think that they can, some think that they cannot."

 

Sacramento Press

 

 

More information on the Field Act

 

Field Act Findings

 

Field Act History and Issues for California Schools

 

The Field Act and Public School Construction:A 2007 Perspective

 

 

Sacramento: A City That Works For Everyone:
How Does Central Sacramento Work For Families?
 
by cecile downs, published on October 29, 2009
 
On Monday, October 19th, parents of the charter school California Montessori Project (CMP)-Capitol Campus where surprised to learn through a letter from CMP Director, Gary Bowman, that Mr. Raymond, the new Superintendent of the Sacramento City Unified School District (SCUSD), was requesting that the Capitol Campus be relocated from the Old Marshall School (2718 G Street), a facility the school had moved into only 3 months prior, because the building was now deemed unsafe. The Capitol Campus is to be relocated in the Thomas Jefferson Elementary School (in the College Glen area) far from the current location forcing hundreds of families on the roads. Moreover the campus has to leave the premises in a hurry, in the middle of the school year -the move has already been planned for November 11th- even though parents learned through a subsequent letter from Gary Bowman (dated Thursday October 22nd) that there is "no imminent danger" and even though no one has yet seen the full report on which the SCUSD based its decision. Parents were not consulted, either about the time frame or by the choice of the new location. There is a perception among the parents community that the SCUSD is forcing a hasty decision in order to facilitate some ulterior plan.
 
Read more here

Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson's slogan for Sacramento is "A City That Works For Everyone". How can the central city work for families if school are disappearing? CMP- Capitol Campus is the only Charter School offering a free-tuition Montessori education in the downtown/midtown area, attracting an extremely diverse community of families. The rightly named “Capitol Campus” has been in existence for eight years (first in the Pioneer Church on L Street, then since August 2009, in the Old Marshall School, where it was able to receive more students and extend its offering to 7th and 8th graders). Many families have made the choice to live in the downtown area because they believe in minimizing their environmental impact and improving the quality of life by living close to work and school. Last August, the Old Marshall School neighborhood community welcomed the school with open arms and big smiles, it was viewed as an important moment in the life of our city. Read more here. Parents are worried that their vision to make midtown more friendly and welcoming to families will never materialize if there are no schools to support families.

Open letter to Susan Miller, Associate Superintendent Sacramento City Unified

Dear Susan Miller,
Thank you for your message, even though it is a form letter that all parents received as a reply; and even though it came when everything had already been decided without any real input from us, the parents. This doesn't reflect a real concern for our situation! Only SCUSD Board member Jerry Houseman has shown a real interest in our problem by engaging into individual and thoughtful conversations, not only with me but with all the parents from whom he had received a letter.

We are forced to move but we still haven't seen the famous report from the architects and engineers hired by the District that claim that the Old Marshall School is not in compliance with the California Building Codes. We, as parents, are very curious to learn what the real problem with the school is: how exactly is the Old Marshall Building not in compliance? When are we going to be able to see and review the full report?
I was looking forward to meeting Superintendent Jonathan Raymond on November 3rd but now I am worried that he will give us the same kind of general, non-specific answers.
It is indeed "most unfortunate" -to quote your words- that our whole school Community has to be uprooted to the College Glen area, nice in itself but not what I signed up for when I enrolled my kids into the "CAPITOL" Campus of CMP. I will now have to spend 20 to 30 minutes on the freeway to take my kids to school every day (which is almost 2 hours in the car each day) when our commute to school is right now only 7 minutes (less than 30 minutes per day in the car).

If I had wanted to drive so far just so that my children would have a soccer field near their school or a real multi-purpose room, I could have signed up for another CMP Campus. What is now the choice of the parents who have chosen the environmentally conscious lifestyle of living, working, shopping, entertaining, and taking their kids to school in downtown Sacramento?
How is it more safe for our family to drive so long to go to school? There is more chance that my children would get injured in a car accident than there is that the Old Marshall School would ever fall on their heads!
We had a nice location at the Pioneer Church that we were outgrowing, so yes we were looking for another location in the downtown area, but we could have stayed there another year or two, till we find the perfect place... Now we have no choice but to take our kids to a distant school or leave CMP in the middle of the school year, which as you know very well is an almost impossible task, not only because the schools are full but because of the hardship it would impose on our children.

The only real support from the District that I would have been grateful for would have been if you had helped us find a location in the downtown area (even if it was only a temporary solution), by working in collaboration with the state or even commercial building owners, so that our families could have remained where we have chosen to be by enrolling our kids into the CMP Capitol Campus.

Sincerely,

Cecile Downs, a distressed and frustrated parent of two CMP students.

 

Sacramento Press


 

 
 
 

Kennedy, Hammond to introduce

schools superintendent to constituents

 

 

 

 

http://www.scusd.edu/Pages/default.aspx

 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Two Great New Education Web Sites

 

 

http://myteachermyhero.com/

 

 

 

 http://classwish.org/

 

Return to Top of Page 

 


 

Damaging language

Have you been reminding others to "Think B4 You Speak" at school or in your community? Tell Us Your Story.

Or come up with a video to tell people it's not ok to say "that's so gay", and it could end up right here. It's easy... Upload Your Video.

The rate at which students use and hear negative language about lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT) people is huge. Over half of all students report hearing homophobic remarks often at school.

 

The common use of anti-LGBT language is directly related to an even bigger problem – the bullying and harassment of LGBT students.

 

9 out of 10 LGBT students report being harassed at school in the last year. Over one-third of LGBT students have been physically assaulted at school because of their sexual orientation or gender identity/expression.

 

Such frequent harassment results in LGBT students being more likely than others to:

  • Feel unsafe

  • Miss school

  • Receive lower grades

  • Not attend college

 

Creating a safe environment for all students - LGBT and straight alike - begins with one simple act: thinking before you speak.

A lot of anti-LGBT language is said carelessly, and isn’t intended as negative or hurtful. Understand what you’re saying, and think about the potential consequences of the words you choose.

 

 

Think B4 You Speak.com

 


Welcome to Parents for Public Schools — San Francisco

 

www.ppssf.org

 
Our Mission
Parents for Public Schools -- San Francisco (PPS-SF) is a network of parents working together to build and ensure quality schools for all San Francisco children.
We do this by providing parent-to-parent information, news and networking and by developing parent leaders at the school and district level.

 

Why I Love My Public School

 

 

www.ppssf.org

 


 

 
 

 

 Get the Hookup at FLU.GOV

 


 

Watch The Principal Story Online

 

 

The Principal Story is a documentary film and media outreach project.  Its purpose is to raise the visibility of leadership as a lever for school improvement, especially in our nation's most challenging schools.

 

Watch online now, until December 14, 2009.  

 

Check your local listings: http://www.pbs.org/pov/tvschedule/


The Principal Story tells two stories, painting a dramatic portrait of the challenges facing America's public schools - and of the great difference a dedicated principal can make. Tresa Dunbar is a second-year principal at Chicago's Nash Elementary, where 98% of students come from low-income families; in Springfield, Illinois, Kerry Purcell has led Harvard Park Elementary, with similar demographics, for six years. Tod Lending ( Omar & Pete, POV 2005) and David Mrazek followed both women over the course of a school year, discovering each one's unique styles yet similar passions. The Principal Story takes the viewer along for an emotional ride that reveals what effective educational leadership looks like in the 21st century.
Visit the POV website ( http://www.pbs.org/pov/principalstory/) to watch an interview with the filmmakers, download free educational materials, sign up to host a screening of the film and access other special features!

You can find images, The Principal Story web banner and logos in the POV Pressroom:
http://www.amdoc.org/pressroom_pov2009.php
 

For more information on this POV production, please contact Amanda Nguyen at:  anguyen@pov.org

 

 

 Return to Top of Page 

 

 
 
 
 

 

Kennedy Center for Performing Arts aids local schools

 

rlillis@sacbee.com

Published Saturday, Oct. 10, 2009

 

Kids learn math every year, but the arts? Well, that often depends on whether their teachers find the subject interesting or their schools have the money.

 

With that in mind, the nationally recognized John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts will help two Sacramento school districts develop long-term arts education programs.

 

Sacramento City Unified and Twin Rivers Unified are the first districts in the nation to be included in the Any Given Child program for students in kindergarten through eighth grade.

 

Kennedy Center officials were in Sacramento on Friday to announce the start of a study expected to last between six months and a year that will examine what arts education programs exist in city schools and what arts groups in the city have to offer.

 

From that study, long-term arts curricula will be designed for schools in the Sacramento City and Twin Rivers systems by partnering local arts organizations with city and school officials. Also, the Kennedy Center will provide teacher training programs, in-class programs and other resources, all at no cost to the schools.

 

"It will be a coordinated approach so that the children will actually go through a progression as they do in any other subject," said Michael Kaiser, president of the Kennedy Center. "Over the K-to-eight period, they will develop a solid knowledge of the arts, an ability to express themselves and a knowledge of a history of the arts."

 

Kaiser said the program was designed to fill gaps in the way young students are exposed to the arts.

 

"We would never accept it if our children came home and said, 'We're not doing mathematics this year because my teacher doesn't like it,' " he said. "But that's how we've always taught the arts."

 

According to a study released in March by SRI International and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, 89 percent of California schools do not offer standards-based courses in dance, music, theater and visual arts. The study also found state school districts lack coordinated arts plans.

 

Kennedy Center officials said they chose Sacramento out of 27 interested cities from around the country in part because of the city's For Art's Sake initiative, started by Mayor Kevin Johnson. That initiative has worked to coordinate local arts organizations and has formed committees working on arts education, funding, facilities, marketing and film.

 

Local school officials applauded the Kennedy Center program.

 

"What arts and music and literature and poetry do for us and our children is that they build confidence, they build curiosity and most importantly, they build that ability to be creative," said Jonathan Raymond, superintendent of Sacramento City Unified. "And that's something that all of our children need today. Not randomly or because of a dedicated teacher or principal, but because we have a plan and the community supports it."

 

"It will change the climate of arts education in Sacramento," said Dr. Ziggy Robeson, assistant superintendent of Twin Rivers.

 



This story is taken from Sacbee / Our Region / Top Stories

 Return to Top of Page 

 

 

 


 
 

 

latimes.com

 

Blowback

 

Dear Richard Riordan

 

An open letter to the former L.A. mayor on making parenting education part of public school reform.

By Esther A. Jantzen

 

October 15, 2009

 

Mayor Richard Riordan, your disappointment in the progress of educational reform in the Los Angeles Unified School District, after all you've done as mayor and secretary of education under Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, was palpable in your Oct. 12 Times Op-Ed article, "Course outline for the LAUSD." This lack of progress breaks my heart too.

 

At the risk of seeming presumptuous, may I make a suggestion to you and to educational reformers everywhere -- a suggestion that is based on experience, common sense and research?

 

I was an urban public high school English teacher for many years. I tried hard: I took courses in teaching reading and writing; I prepared for classes; I graded research papers on vacations; I won grants for my schools; I won teacher of the year awards; I got advanced degrees; I supported reform.

 

None of this made much difference. And the six recommendations you made, Mr. Riordan, aren't going to either, though I wish they would because they're definitely implementable.

 

There's a more significant place where I recommend you put your money and efforts. But it doesn't seem cutting-edge or profoundly innovative.

 

What's needed -- the sine qua non of improved learning -- is parenting education. Honestly and truly, in terms of real literacy, the home is more important than the school.

 

You know you can't build a good house without a good foundation. Similarly, family literacy is all the activity in the home that provides kids with the foundational experiences on which comprehending the written word is based.

 

What parents need to be taught specifically is how to support the linguistic, cognitive, social and emotional development of their children. That means no-cost activities such as conversing with kids, asking thoughtful questions, reading aloud, modeling reading and writing, exposing them to the larger world, showing them how to find and use resources, loving them, hugging them and speaking kindly to them.

 

I believe young parents can be shown, taught, encouraged and supported in learning to do these things. They love their kids deeply. They want success for them. Often they just don't know the best ways to help them, and that goes for wealthy parents as well as poor ones.

 

What I'm suggesting goes beyond First Five, Head Start and No Child Left Behind. How about a federal and state Office of Parenting Education and a massive marketing campaign about best parenting practices that reaches as deeply into the home as soft-drink ads do?

 

Mr. Riordan, I implore you to consider throwing your political weight, insights and resources toward parenting education. You've raised children. You would agree that "parenting literacy" is a missing ingredient in many homes, wouldn't you?

 

Yet as the Chinese proverb says, "To know and not to do is yet not to know."

 

Please, Mr. Riordan.

 

Esther A. Jantzen is a writer and children's literacy advocate living in Pomona.

 

Copyright © 2009, The Los Angeles Times

 

latimes.com

 

 

 Return to Top of Page 

 


State Schools Chief Jack O'Connell Offers Education Agencies a New Tool to Combat the Achievement Gap

 

Closing the Achievement Gap Partnerships Resource Kit Web Site

 

 

 SACRAMENTO - State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O’Connell today announced that a key recommendation by his CaliforniaP-16 Council is being implemented with the release of a new online tool called the Resource Kit for Developing Partnerships to Close the Achievement Gap (Resource Kit).

 

"Family and community partners are powerful and critical allies for schools working to improve student success and close the achievement gap," said O'Connell. "The success of our students is directly connected to the success of our state and national economy. That’s why I urge businesses, faith-based organizations, parents, community groups, and others to get involved in their local schools. We all have a stake in preparing all students to compete in the hypercompetitive global economy, and schools need our support and assistance to reach that goal."

 

The Resource Kit may be used by families, communities, and organizations to develop partnerships with schools that can help narrow the academic achievement gap that exists between higher-performing and lower-performing students. This online tool can help anyone understand the importance of partnerships, how to create them, and help existing partnerships improve. Users may access links to information on different types of partnerships with families, faith-based organizations, community-based organizations, business, government agencies, institutions of higher learning, and youth service organizations. The Resource Kit also offers examples of real-life successful partnerships.

 

The Resource Kit is a result of one of the recommendations made in January by O'Connell's California P-16 Council. The P-16 Council was formed in 2004 to examine ways to improve student achievement and create a comprehensive, integrated system of student learning from preschool through higher education. The Council researched factors that inhibit successful student learning and grouped them into four themes called ACES:

 

1. Access: Do students have equal access to good teachers and rigorous curriculum?

 

2. Culture and Climate: Are students' learning environment safe and promote a sense of belonging?

 

3. Expectations: Does a culture of excellence exist for students and adults alike, so that a common, high standard is the norm for all students?

 

4. Strategies: Are proven teaching practices being used?

 

One of the ACES recommendations is to develop partnerships to close the achievement gap. The P-16 Council found that connecting schools with educational organizations, city and county agencies, faith-based organizations, parent groups, and businesses is necessary to foster partnerships that will support a well-defined student support system. Such partnerships recognize that students have needs outside the classroom that, if unmet, can significantly and adversely affect their ability to learn. Breaking down barriers and creating partnerships throughout California is an important step toward implementing a consistent approach to a high-quality and inclusive educational program.

 

"Too often in government, when recommendations are made by task forces or blue ribbon commissions on complex issues, they are forgotten as soon as the group disbands," added O'Connell. "The Resource Kit is one of 14 recommendations by the P-16 Council to narrow the achievement gap that we are engaged in implementing. I fully intend to implement all 14 recommendations before my term in office expires so that we can improve conditions at the state level that help close the gap. We must ensure that every child has a chance to succeed academically and in life."

 

The Coordinated School Health Work Group Steering Committee worked with the statewide P-16 Council to create the Resource Kit. The Committee represents education and community health partners, and other state-level stakeholders.

The Resource Kit is available online through the California Department of Education's Closing the Achievement Gap Web site at
www.closingtheachievementgap.org/partnerships. For more information on the P-16 Council, please visit http://www.cde.ca.gov/eo/in/pc/.


The California Department of Education is a state agency led by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell. The core purpose of CDE is to lead and support the continuous improvement of student achievement, with a specific focus on closing achievement gaps. For more information, please visit
http://www.cde.ca.gov or by mobile device at http://m.cde.ca.gov/. You may also follow Superintendent O'Connell (@SSPIJack) on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/sspijack.

 

 

 

 Return to Top of Page 


   

 California and the Race to the Top

 

 

This weekend, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed three pieces of legislation that he says will make California more competitive for "Race to the Top" funds under the federal government's stimulus package for education.
 
But while this signals the administration's desire to compete for the Race to the Top grants, California still needs to grapple with significant questions and hurdles related to the reforms the federal government is asking for.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, also known as the federal stimulus bill, was signed into law in February 2009.

The legislation is designed to stimulate the U.S. economy and provides close to $100 billion for education nationwide. The investment represents about $8 billion in education funding for California, according to the California Department of Education (CDE). The amount of could grow if the state successfully secures some additional competitive grants included in the ARRA.

Much of the $8 billion is for augmentations to existing programs—e.g., Title I for disadvantaged students and IDEA for students with disabilities. Over $3 billion is coming through the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund, which provides largely discretionary monies and requires states to report on specific indicators in four reform areas:

  1. Increasing teacher and principal effectiveness;
  2. Establishing data systems and using data for improvement;
  3. Adopting rigorous college- and career-ready standards and high-quality assessments;
  4. Turning around the lowest-performing schools.

 

The largest of the competitive grant programs is Race to the Top, which will provide a total of about $4.35 billion to a small group of states with bold plans for action in the four reform areas listed above. Up to $350 million of the Race to the Top fund is set aside for states to develop new assessments. Other competitive grants will provide incentives to enhance teacher recruitment and retention, create alternative pay structures for teachers, and develop longitudinal data systems. In addition, Invest in Innovation ("i3") provides funding for local entities to explore promising ideas and expand proven programs.

October 12, 2009 Update:
Gov. Schwarzenegger has signed three bills that he says will increase California’s chances of securing a Race to the Top grant:

  • Senate Bill 19: Among other things, this bill removes the prohibition against using data from the burgeoning California Education Information System for purposes of pay, promotion, sanction, or evaluation of teachers. The bill thereby removes the “firewall” that federal Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said existed between California’s personnel evaluations and student achievement data and thus addresses one of two eligibility criteria of the Race to the Top.
  • Senate Bill 680: This bill extends and expands the School District of Choice program, which allows districts to accept inter-district transfers according to specified criteria.
  • Assembly Bill 1130: The current Academic Performance Index (API) system compares annual snapshots of test scores, with different students' test scores represented in each snapshot because of the entry and exit of students from schools each year. AB 1130 asks that the committee advising the Superintendent of Public Instruction on the Academic Performance Index recommend to the Superintendent and the State Board of Education a method of holding schools and districts accountable for the academic growth of the same students over time.

Meanwhile, the California Legislature continues to consider additional legislation related to competing for a Race to the Top grant in a special legislative session.

 

 

 

EdSource

 

 

Return to Top of Page 


 
 
 
 

Sac City Unified hopes hand washing twice a day keeps flu away

 

 

 

atong@sacbee.com

Published Friday, Oct. 02, 2009

 

Starting Monday, students at Sacramento City Unified schools will have a new subject to master: hand washing.

On Thursday new district Superintendent Jonathan Raymond announced that a hand-washing campaign will kick off next week. District schools are now required to designate two times a day when all students will get up, go to the nearest sink and wash their hands.

 

Hand washing is one of the best ways to prevent H1N1 flu transmission, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, something Raymond is taking seriously.

 

"Our most important responsibility is to make sure our kids are well," he said.

 

The novel flu strain H1N1, which emerged this year and has spread worldwide, has been particularly concerning to school officials because school-age children and young adults are especially susceptible to it, unlike with the seasonal flu.

 

While the CDC reported nationwide spikes in H1N1, commonly known as swine flu, coinciding with school openings, Sacramento City has not had an unusual number of students out ill, said Paulette Meeks, the district's health services director.

 

There have been 96 confirmed cases of H1N1 in students, she said.

 

In addition to the twice-a-day hand washing, the district has purchased extra soap and antibacterial hand sanitizer, and is hanging up oversized posters reading "Have U Washed Your Hands 2Day?" Teachers are being asked to incorporate the message into lesson plans, for example assigning hand-washing themed crossword puzzles and word scrambles.

 

Raymond said schools will make their own decisions about how to implement the hand-washing campaign.

 

At Caroline Wenzel Elementary, all students will wash their hands after recess and before lunch in their classrooms. Social worker interns will come into each class to teach hand-washing technique, such as singing "Happy Birthday" twice to make sure students wash their hands for 20 seconds.

The district's hand-washing campaign is part of larger effort to keep H1N1 at bay. On Thursday, state Superintendent Jack O'Connell spoke about the importance of hand washing at press conferences in San Jose and San Diego, and unveiled the Pandemic Influenza Planning Manual for California public schools.

 

Sacramento Superintendent Raymond also announced several new district safety initiatives, including creation of a "Security Council." The council will review schools' security methods and make recommendations for improvement before year's end, Raymond said.

 

 

 

This story is taken from Sacbee / Our Region

 

Return to Top of Page 

 


 

 
 
 

SCUSD Vice President Patrick Kennedy

 Gains Support in Bid for  Sacramento’s 5th City Council District

 

 

Sacramento City Council Member Bonnie Pannell and Council Member Sandy Sheedy Endorse Patrick Kennedy for City Council

Sacramento City Council Member Bonnie Pannell and Council Member Sandy Sheedy have endorsed Patrick Kennedy’s campaign for Sacramento City Council, District 5.

“I am proud to have the support of Council Members Pannell and Sheedy. I have had the great privilege of working with them over the years and look forward to continuing that relationship when I am on the City Council,” said Patrick upon the announcement.


Pannell represents District 8 in South Sacramento and Sheedy represents District 2 in North Sacramento. They join their colleagues, Council Members Ray Tretheway (District 1) and Steve Cohn (District 3) in endorsing Patrick Kennedy for Sacramento City Council. 

 

 

 


 
 

DonorsChoose.org

Sacramento City Educational Foundation's Giving

 

 

DonorsChoose.org

Sacramento City Educational Foundation's Giving

 


 

U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan

 to Visit Sacramento

 
SCUSD will be hosting a First Day of School press event on September 3rd, at 10:30 a.m. at David Lubin Elementary.David Lubin Elementary School
3535 M St
Sacramento, CA 95816-5499
Driving Directions


Invited guests include the New Superintendent, Mayor Kevin Johnson, the SCUSD School Board, and SSPI Jack O'Connell. Parents and members of the community are welcome to attend.

THIS THURSDAY, September 3rd at 10:30, join us at David Lubin Elementary for the
 "Sacramento Goes Back to School" celebration,
 featuring the new SCUSD Superintendent Jonathan Raymond, Mayor Kevin Johnson and other guests - including the River Cats mascot (for the kids, of course!)

 

 

 United States Secretary of Education Arne Duncan

Date:               Thursday, September 3, 2009


Time:             5:00pm - 6:00pm

 

Location:     Tsakopoulos Library


Street:            828 I Street

City/Town:  Sacramento, CA

 
Tsakopoulos Library
828 I St
Sacramento, CA 95814
Driving Directions
Click the map to open an interactive map in a new window.
On Thursday, September 3rd United States Secretary of Education Arne Duncan is coming to Sacramento. I admired Arne Duncan’s leadership before he was appointed Secretary of Education. A former Chicago superintendent, Duncan’s district was one of the first to push mutual consent in teacher hiring, ensuring that every school was staffed with high quality teachers. His Renaissance 2010 initiative closed down vacant schools to reopen them with strong options for young people.

Secretary Duncan is now bringing those same ideals and strategies to schools and districts across the nation. He wants to make sure that we are a country that has a common set of rigorous standards, strong data systems linking student and teacher performance, performance and merit pay, and intervention for failing schools.
What does this mean for Sacramento? I firmly believe that if you have great schools, you will have a great city. As Mayor, my commitment is to make sure that the City of Sacramento, our county and our region are known for great public schools.

Sacramento can be one of the leaders in education reform. As the capitol of California, we should be the hotbed of reform and innovation.

We have created an education “white paper” for Sacramento that aligns with Secretary of Education Duncan’s plan for national reform. I encourage you to read the "white paper" and learn more about Secretary of Education Duncan’s visit to Sacramento.
 
 
 
 
 
Return to Top of Page 

 

Sacramento Coalition to Save Public Education Speaks Out

 

Our new superintendent, plus the County Superintendent Dave Gordon, and Elk Grove Superintendent Steve Ladd were all at this press conference which took place at a school that isn't part of SCUSD. I was shocked when SCUSD Superintendent Raymond said that he was excited to be part of Mayor Johnson's team. When you use the link you need to click on part three. That is the part that contains SCUSD Superintendent Raymond's statement.

If you think it is noteworthy, please forward to as many parents and teachers as you know. It is important to tell our new superintendent that he works for SCUSD not for Kevin Johnson. Have SCUSD parents and students who attend our schools told him that he should join with Kevin Johnson 2 days after he starts working for us? That wasn't the message at CK McClatchy from parents, students, and teachers. We need to let Superintendent Raymond know that KJ barely won Oak Park when he was elected and did not do well in the other parts of SCUSD. He won Natomas and the areas not part of SCUSD. Supt. Raymond needs to focus on the opening of district schools, the transition process for the students from closed schools, and on making sure that our students have teachers in the classrooms on the first day of school. We should also let our Board of Education know that we don't want our Superintendent attending Kevin Johnson press conferences or events. We want him learning about our district from the ground up.

How will he be able to fairly evaluate Sacramento Charter High School when he is already a part of the Mayor's team?

Heidi McLean, chairperson
Sacramento Coalition to Save Public Education

 

 
 
 
 
From the  SCUSD Observer 
 
 

Thursday, August 27, 2009

White paper or wall paper?

In March of this year, Sacramento Mayor, Kevin Johnson, held an education summit to purportedly address educational options for Sacramento schools, accountability for results and the utilization of...Continue reading this story at the SCUSD Observer 
 

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Transcript of Jonathan Raymond's remarks at Kevin Johnson's press conference

At Monday's press conference with state and local education leaders at Valley High School (Elk Grove Unified), Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson introduced Jonathan Raymond as a rookie member, apparently, of his ...Continue reading this story at the SCUSD Observer 
 
 

 
 
Look Who is Blogging
 
 
 

 
Mayor's education report praises charter schools
by Kathleen Haley

Mayor Kevin Johnson issued numerous draft recommendations Monday for improvements to Sacramento’s education system. They included evaluating schools with letter grades and setting up new educational programs and schools.

The recommendations come out of the Mayor’s Education Summit, which was held in Sacramento in March and featured education figures such as New York City Schools Chancellor Joel Klein and Michelle Rhee, chancellor of public schools in Washington, D.C. The ideas expressed in the draft white paper also include input from local educators, parents and citizens.

“What we wanted to do with the white paper is to create a dialogue,” Johnson told reporters at a press conference with state and local education leaders at Valley High School in Sacramento. He said he did not have a set timeline for implementing the recommendations.

The draft white paper includes an idea to stress accountability by rating schools with A-F letter grades. The idea comes from the grading program being used at New York City schools. “These report cards provide a mechanism through which parents and community members can make decisions and determinations for their children based on consistent, clear and objective data,” the white paper notes.

The paper points out that the community would need to analyze the idea in order to figure out how a grading system could work in Sacramento schools. The recommendation would in part start a “community conversation to develop the components of a school and district report card.”

The recommendations also address charter schools, as well as other specialized programs at schools. One of the recommendations states that the city could contact “educational management organizations that have seen success across the state and nation to open schools in Sacramento or partner in turning around low-performing schools.”

Johnson also announced at the Monday press conference that U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan will make a presentation on education in Sacramento on Sept. 3. The city will hold a town hall meeting at which Duncan will speak. Also on Sept. 3, Duncan will meet with state leaders during his trip to Sacramento, Johnson said.
 

Click here go to the  

 
 


Community Partnership Meetings &

Neighborhood Advisory Group

 

Neighborhood Services hosts or helps coordinate monthly meetings in each area to facilitate communication between the City and community on issues, policies, and priorities. Each month, guest speakers from various City departments and other agencies provide information on current community initiatives and opportunities for public participation.

Come to our next meeting to learn what is going on in your neighborhood! The Neighborhood Services Department serves the City using four geographic areas.

 

 View this map to see which area your neighborhood is in.

 

AREA 1 Neighborhood Advisory Group

Next Meeting: August 17 @ 6:30pm

Hart Senior Center

915 27th Street

Click Here to view Meeting Calendar

 

AREA 2 Community Partnership Meeting

Next Meeting: September 9 @ 7pm

Pannell Meadowview Community Center

2450 Meadowview Road

Click here to view Meeting Calendar

 

AREA 3 Community Partnership Meeting

Next Meeting: September 24 @ 7pm

Coloma Community Center

4623 T Street

Click here to view Meeting Calendar

 

AREA 4 Community Partnership Meeting

Next Meeting: September 14 @ 7pm

Robertson Community Center

3525 Norwood Ave.

Click here to view Meeting Calendar

 

 

City of Sacramento > Neighborhood Services > Get Involved! >

 

 

 


 

NEW! The Community Resource Directory
 
The Community Resource Directory was created to help site administrators and staff more easily connect parents and students to community services. It was specifically designed with SCUSD in mind, focusing only on those resources that are local, relevant and easy to access.
 
 
 

 

 

 


 

 

SCUSD Vice President Patrick Kennedy

 Announces Bid for  Sacramento’s 5th City Council District

 

 

Thank you for visiting the website for my campaign for Sacramento’s 5th City Council District. It has been my honor to serve our community for the past 20 years, first as a neighborhood activist and City Planning Commissioner, and currently as an elected member of the Sacramento City School Board. I look forward to continuing this commitment to the public on the City Council as we face tomorrow’s challenges together.

 

Please use this site to gather information about this campaign and me. I hope you share with me your thoughts and ideas by phone or email. I look forward to hearing from you and would love to have your support.

 

Sincerely,

 

Patrick Kennedy


Sacramento City School Board Member
Candidate, Sacramento City Council

 

www.patrick-kennedy.com

 

 

 

Click Here Go to Patrick Kennedy for Sacramento’s 5th City Council District Web Site

 

 

 

About Patrick

Patrick Kennedy is a fourth generation Sacramentan who serves on the Sacramento City School Board, representing the Oak Park, South Curtis Park, Hollywood Park and the Med Center neighborhoods. Patrick has announced his candidacy for Sacramento City Council to continue to serve his community and Sacramento.

 

In addition to his service on the Sacramento City School Board, Patrick is a private practice attorney.

In 1993 Sacramento Mayor Joe Serna, Jr. appointed Patrick to the Sacramento City Planning Commission where he served until 2004, under both Mayors Serna and Yee. Mayor Serna also named him to the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency, Oak Park Project Committee Area.

Patrick’s long record of involvement in his neighborhoods also includes service as President of the Oak Park Neighborhood Improvement Association, founding president of the Hollywood Park Neighborhood Association, member of the Sacramento RT District South Sacramento Citizens’ Advisory Committee, member of the UCD Med Center Expansion Advisory Board, member of the McClellan AFB Reuse Planning Team, Board Member of Sacramento Self Help Housing and the Health Project.

 

As the Associate Director for Statewide Initiatives for the president of the University of California, Patrick advocated for improved technology access for California’s K-12 students bridging the “digital divide” in order to serve those children with the greatest needs. Patrick also worked for the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) where he managed a statewide infrastructure construction, distribution, and installation business aimed at developing and growing access to clean air technologies.

 

It was during his tenure at SMUD that he began attending law school at night while raising a young family. Patrick received his law degree from Lincoln Law School of Sacramento and his B.A. degree in government from Sacramento State. While attending college Patrick worked for former State Treasurer Phil Angelides, the late U.S. Representative Robert Matsui and his mentor, Mayor Serna.

 

Patrick grew up not far from his current home in Hollywood Park. Raised by a single mother who lost her life to drug and alcohol addiction when he was a young boy, Patrick understands many of the difficulties families face every day, particularly in these economically difficult times.

Patrick and his wife Judy, an artist and teacher, share their Hollywood Park home with the youngest of their four daughters, Sinead (18) and Chelsea (16), as well as Fiona (a miniature Dachshund), Clancy (an Irish Setter) and Etcetera (an ornery Siamese cat).

 Click Here Go to Patrick Kennedy for Sacramento’s 5th City Council District Web Site

 

Return to Top of Page 


 15 may seek seats on Sacramento City Council

rlillis@sacbee.com

Published Monday, Jul. 20, 2009

 

 

All of a sudden, a seat on the Sacramento City Council is a hot ticket.

 

As many as 15 candidates have lined up for or are considering runs in next year's four council races, the most in two decades. It's in stark contrast to 2008, when all four incumbents up for election ran without opposition.

 

There seem to be as many theories behind the renewed interest as there are candidates.

 

Many say it's a result of last November's elections, when the word "change" became a political catchphrase and Mayor Kevin Johnson defeated incumbent Mayor Heather Fargo, who had served in City Hall for 19 years.

 

Others say the city's dire economic situation is inspiring people to get involved. For others, running for City Council is part of the natural progression of their careers.

 

The candidates range from neighborhood activists and political rookies in their 20s to school board veterans. Three incumbents are seeking re-election. A former mayoral candidate has expressed interest, and a former state legislator is said to be interested.

 

"There's a new energy in Sacramento, politically speaking," said local political analyst Gary Dietrich. "There was a long-established, kind of old guard that worked alongside Heather Fargo, and Kevin Johnson kind of shook up the bag of nuts (when he defeated her). I think he's sparked somewhat of a political renaissance."

 

Last year was the first time all four council members up for re-election ran unopposed, going back to at least 1971, according to city election records.

From the  SCUSD Observer 

Kennedy to run for city council?
 
In today's Sacramento Bee, Ryan Lillis reports that Mayor Kevin Johnson is backing former SCUSD Board Member Jay Schenirer to run for Sacramento City Council District Seat 5.

Political insiders say he also has the inside track on garnering Johnson's support because as vice president of the Sacramento City Unified School District board, Schenirer voted in favor of turning Sacramento High School into a charter school run by Johnson's nonprofit St. HOPE.

"Endorsements are important for what they show, that there are leaders in the community who believe in me," Schenirer said. "But at the end of the day, it's about connecting with the people who live in this district."
Current SCUSD Board Member Patrick Kennedy has also apparently thrown his hat into the ring for ...Continue reading this story at the SCUSD Observer 
  

 

Incumbents have done particularly well even when faced with opposition: The last time a challenger upended a sitting council member (not inc luding the mayor) was 1992, and it's only happened eight times since 1975.

 

Three incumbents – Steve Cohn, Ray Tretheway and Robbie Waters – are running for re-election in 2010.

 

Council races divide families, political loyalties

Published Wednesday, Jul. 22, 2009

 

There are some interesting conflicts in the list of those getting behind rival candidates in the District 5 council race.

 

On Monday, The Bee reported that candidate Jay Schenirer had lined up some big names for an August fundraiser. Later that day, one of his challengers – Patrick Kennedy – sent along a list of his supporters.

 

Schenirer, a former Sac City Unified school board member and a consultant for high-powered foundations, and Kennedy, a sitting school board member, are battling three others to take over the seat being vacated in 2010 by Councilwoman Lauren Hammond. Hammond, who has held the seat since 1997, is running for Assembly.

 

According to a flier announcing Schenirer's Aug. 6 fundraiser, West Sacramento Mayor Christopher Cabaldon is a supporter.

 

Kennedy's list of backers includes three West Sacramento council members: Mark Johannessen, who opposed Cabaldon in the November election, and William Kristoff and Oscar Villegas, who in the past aligned themselves with Cabaldon.

Developer Mark Friedman is backing Schenirer. Developer Angelo G. Tsakopoulos is backing Kennedy.

 

Reuben Serna, brother of the late Mayor Joe Serna Jr., is behind Kennedy. Phil Serna, son of the late mayor, is behind Schenirer.

 

With so many candidates running for four council seats next year, expect more divisions to emerge. 

 

 



This story is taken from Sacbee / Our Region

Councilwoman Lauren Hammond is vacating the District 5 seat she's held since 1997 to run for the state Assembly.

 

 

Hammond's jump into the Assembly race has resulted in a packed field in District 5, where five candidates are running for the seat that covers neighborhoods such as Curtis Park, Oak Park and Hollywood Park in the city's south central side.

 

The size of the field vying for Hammond's seat isn't surprising, given the rarity of having an incumbent give up a council slot.

 

Candidates who have filed paperwork with the city announcing their intentions to run include: Kasey Cotulla, a partner in a local printing company; Terrence Johnson, a small-business owner and executive director for the Oak Park Business Association and Stockton Boulevard Partnership; Sacramento City Unified School District board member Patrick Kennedy; Jay Schenirer, a consultant for various nonprofit foundations and former city school board member; and Jameel Pugh, a mentoring specialist with the city school district and former standout basketball player at Sacramento State.

 

The District 5 race highlights the range of political exposure of next year's candidates. Kennedy and Schenirer have both held elected positions; the other three have never run a campaign.

 

Schenirer has already lined up big names for an August fundraiser, including state Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, West Sacramento Mayor Christopher Cabaldon and developer Mark Friedman.

 

Political insiders say he also has the inside track on garnering Johnson's support because as vice president of the Sacramento City Unified School District board, Schenirer voted in favor of turning Sacramento High School into a charter school run by Johnson's nonprofit St. HOPE.

 

"Endorsements are important for what they show, that there are leaders in the community who believe in me," Schenirer said. "But at the end of the day, it's about connecting with the people who live in this district."

 

At the other end of the political spectrum is Cotulla, one of at least seven candidates trying to break into the city's elected circles for the first time.

 

"Sacramento has been run with a kind of tiered system in how council members come up," he said. "They stand in line and the next person who's been tapped is ready to be queued up. I don't like that system."

 

The fields forming in opposition to Cohn and Waters, the longest-tenured council members, are smaller.

 

Cohn, whose District 3 covers neighborhoods in east Sacramento, has no opposition as of yet, but there are rumblings he could have in the form of some familiar names.

 

Former state Sen. Deborah Ortiz – who also was a councilwoman in the 1990s – has been mentioned as a potential candidate. Ortiz did not return phone messages last week.

 

Former mayoral candidate and midtown business owner Shawn Eldredge is considering running but said he will not raise funds.

 

"I expect I'm going to be in," he said. "I won't, however, if a 20-something with a Ph.D. and a good head who's not a politician joins the race."

 

District 7 Councilman Waters is opposed by Ryan Chin, the director of strategic communications at California State University, Sacramento, and a former Sacramento County planning commissioner. Another candidate, John Puente, recently dropped out.

 

The district covers the Pocket and Valley Hi neighborhoods of south Sacramento.

 

Tretheway is opposed by three candidates for the District 1 seat that covers North and South Natomas: Angelique Ashby, a consultant and neighborhood activist from North Natomas; John Dahilig, a 27-year-old who was a combat medic with the Marines and is now in the Navy Reserve; and Lisa Kaplan, a Natomas Unified School District board member.

 

For Natomas, which has had significant growth in the past decade, this is the largest field of candidates since 1989.

 

Before next year's election, other candidates are expected to surface. At least one other person is considering running for the council but told The Bee he hasn't reached a decision.

 

"I think (local politics) has become an insider's game in many people's minds," Dietrich said. "But now a lot of people are saying they can get inside that circle."

 



This story is taken from Sacbee / Our Region / Top Stories

Return to Top of Page