Cutbacks threaten public education across U.S.
By Heather Cottin
Published Dec 22, 2008 7:57 PM
Even while trillions of dollars were being poured into the Pentagon budget, education in the United States was slipping behind the rest of the world.
According to the National Governors Association Web site, in just 11 years—from 1995 to 2006—the percentage of college-age people who obtained a bachelor’s degree in the U.S. dropped from first place in the world to 14th. By 2006, the U.S. had the highest college dropout rate of 19 industrialized countries. And eighth graders here have been losing ground in mathematics and science.
|
Students at Portola Middle School join the protest outside Dec. 10 West Contra Costa Unified School District Board meeting in Richmond, Calif., to demand that their school stay open.
WW photo: Judy Greenspan |
|
Nevertheless, huge cutbacks in school funding are now being announced at every level of public education across the U.S. Schools get most of their funds from state and local governments. About 21 percent of state budgets are spent on K-12 education.
In early November the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reported that, because of budget shortfalls due to the declining economy, at least 16 states were proposing to cut funding for kindergarten through 12th grade as well as early education. On the level of higher education, at least 21 states had already implemented cuts to public colleges and universities. The cuts had resulted in layoffs of faculty and staff and, in more than half these states, tuition hikes of 5 to 15 percent.
And the cuts keep growing as more jobs are lost, the economy declines, and the federal government uses public money to bail out the banks.
In California, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is calling for education cutbacks of $2.5 billion in K-12 schools. The California state universities plan to cut admissions—though figures show applications to the Cal State University system are up 21 percent as fewer people can afford private universities.
CSU tuition has risen in six of the last seven years. California community colleges may lose up to 260,000 students due to forced budget cutbacks.
In Connecticut, Education Commissioner Mark K. McQuillan has warned that budget shortfalls in that state would result in cutting education aid to municipalities by 6 to 12 percent. (Hartford Courant, Dec. 2)
Hard-hit by the crisis in the auto industry, Detroit is contemplating the closure of 63 schools by 2013. At two area high schools there is now a lack of heat and lights in the classrooms and a shortage of teachers. (Michigan Messenger, Dec. 15)
Lights are out in the hallways in the Las Cruces public schools in New Mexico. There is no money for substitute teachers so teachers are advised “not to be absent.” (Las Cruces Sun News, Dec. 14)
The Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care provides money for early education and after-school programs for 31,000 children from low-income families. Another 18,000 children are on a waiting list. But as the number of homeless families skyrockets due to both layoffs and foreclosures, the state on Nov. 3 implemented a “voucher freeze” that would cut off access to child care for homeless families. (Boston Herald, Dec. 14)
|
New York Gov. David Paterson released his 2010 budget on the morning of Dec. 16. That afternoon, 500 City University of New York faculty members, staff, students and their supporters protested outside his New York City office. The vast majority of CUNY students are the sons, daughters or members of New York City’s working class, and raising tuition by hundreds of dollars will make getting an education much harder. Barbara Bowen, president of CUNY’s Professional Staff Congress, which called the protest, pointed out that an alternative to raising tuition would be raising the tax rate the rich currently pay in New York. |
In the small Wisconsin city of Rhinelander, 50 percent of students are poor enough to qualify for the school lunch program. But there’s not enough money, so, to make up the shortfall from the state, the school board wants to reduce graduation requirements, thereby reducing the quality of education. (NewsoftheNorth.net)
In South Carolina, at a time when the state’s student population is increasing, a growing number of teachers are retiring and the rate of teacher turnover remains high, the state government has decided to shut down the state’s major teacher training program. (The State, Dec. 15)
In Vermont the legislature is threatening a rise in state college tuition that would come to nearly 20 percent at some institutions. While enrollment has increased 42 percent in the last eight years, full-time faculty has increased just 11 percent. The Green Mountain State expects a 13-percent drop in the state appropriation for education. Families may have to borrow more or not send their children to college at all. (Burlington Free Press, Dec. 12)
In New York, Gov. David Paterson has had to delay proposed cuts to education until next September. However his proposed 2009-2010 spending plan would reduce school budgets by more than $2.5 billion, or more than 12 percent.
The governor’s budget proposal would raise undergraduate tuition at the State University of New York and the City University of New York. The governor would also reduce funding to SUNY training hospitals by $24 million.
The New York State Legislature is contemplating a freeze on universal pre-kindergarten funding through 2011 and a cut in full-day kindergarten and preschool funding. (Internal document from New York State United Teachers, Dec. 17)
Students, parents say: ‘Fight for us!’
While many people are still waking up to the juggernaut of budget cuts coming at them, the fightback has already begun in some areas.
Hundreds of CUNY students and teachers responded to attacks on their city university system with a rally in front of the governor’s New York City office on Dec. 16.
In Richmond, Calif., a largely African-American, Latin@ and immigrant school district, the threatened closing of several elementary schools and two high schools led to a mass turnout of students, parents and teachers of the West Contra Costa Unified School District at a Dec. 10 school board meeting.
Richmond faces declining enrollments because evictions and foreclosures have forced people to leave the district.
When the school board announced cuts to make up for what it called a budget shortfall, state budget cuts and “under-enrollment,” more than 500 parents, teachers, community activists and children tried to get into the meeting room chanting, “Save our schools!” “Save our community!” and “We want justice!” They appealed to the board to “Fight for us!”
Pixie Hayward Schickele, teachers’ union president from United Teachers of Richmond, urged the board to “Stand in solidarity with all of us: teachers, parents, students, all the people who work in our schools and who keep our schools safe. We need to let Sacramento [the state capital] know that we have had enough!”
A youth from Pinole Valley High said: “If you close our school, then we have no future. Keep all our schools open.” She was supported by William Haines, the sophomore class president from Kennedy High School. “The people have spoken. You must find a way to keep the schools open!”
Judy Greenspan, a nontenured teacher, challenged the board: “You can sit by and close the school or you can join the community to fight, go to Sacramento. Because if the bankers got all the money, auto companies got the money, then the people deserve it too.”
Many called on fellow community residents to do what the people did at Republic Windows and Doors in Chicago and sit in for their schools, their community and their children.
The struggle for the right to adequate public education is just beginning.
Articles copyright 1995-2008 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email:
ww@workers.orgSubscribe
wwnews-subscribe@workersworld.netSupport independent news
http://www.workers.org/orders/donate.php 
Page printed from:
http://www.workers.org/2009/us/cutbacks_0108/
Return to Top of Page
Budget woes could last years, states told
By James Salzer
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Sunday, December 14, 2008
State lawmakers from across the country meeting in Atlanta this weekend got a sobering message: They will likely have to continue to cut spending for years.
Already facing a collective shortfall in the range of $70 billion this year, many states will have to deal with shortfalls well after the country’s economy begins to recover, economists and fiscal experts said.
That could force even states run by lawmakers dead set against raising taxes to eventually consider increasing cigarette, gas or sales taxes.
It’s going to be a tough couple of years to get through here because revenues are going to be lousy and demands on spending are going to be going up, David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor’s, told lawmakers Saturday at the National Conference of State Legislatures’ fall forum.
You’re going to have to bite the bullet. You are going to have significant budget cuts, and you may well have to see some tax increases as well because I’m not sure you’re going to be able to do it on the budget [cutting] side.
National improvement
Wyss, a former senior staff economist with the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, said he expects the economy to start improving during the second half of next year unless oil prices spike and banks continue to not lend money.
This recession is just getting to the worst part, he said.
However, Corina Eckl, fiscal program director for the NCSL, noted in a panel Friday that state fiscal conditions tend to deteriorate two or three years after the end of a recession. Increased costs for services, such as the health program Medicaid, continue to rise while tax collections lag in a recovery.
That’s what happened during the recession that ended in late 2001. In state governments, the fiscal crisis lasted from 2002 through 2004.
Governors from across the country have already met with President-elect Barack Obama about the fiscal problems, and a federal stimulus package has been promised.
While that could bring money for roads and other construction projects, it may not help with rising costs for health care and education.
In Georgia, state government helps pay to educate about 2 million students and provides health care to about 1.5 million people. State government employs about 100,000 workers and pays a large portion of the salaries of more than 100,000 teachers.
Because of slow tax collections, the state of Georgia faces a budget shortfall ranging from $1.6 billion to more than $2 billion, depending on who is making the projection.
Gov. Sonny Perdue has told agencies to expect to cut spending 8 percent this year. They have been told to draw up plans for cuts in fiscal 2010, which begins July 1.
While there has been a hiring freeze at state agencies for months, there haven’t, as of yet, been large-scale layoffs.
Good by comparison
Georgia state Sen. Don Balfour (R-Snellville), who is president-elect of the NCSL this year, said the financial problems in some states seem almost hopeless.
We’re doing bad, Balfour said. Compared to New York, Nevada, California, Michigan we’re doing pretty good.
For example, California, one of the states hit hardest by the housing meltdown, may have a shortfall reaching $40 billion over the next two years.
North Carolina state Rep. Pryor Gibson, a Democrat who serves as a House Finance Committee chairman, said his state had been a lot like Georgia in the past. Both had fast-growing populations and economies that generally outperformed the national economy.
But Charlotte is also a major center for the troubled financial sector, home to banking giants Wachovia and Bank of America.
Gibson said in a budget seminar Friday that he expects his state’s government to eventually have to lay off workers to balance the budget.
This is new territory for us, Gibson said. Our anticipation is we’ll be doing a lot of cutting in North Carolina.
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Return to Top of Page
Will schools have to close early due to legislators' idiocy?
The hapless Guv.The “tyranny of the minority” is holding California’s state budget hostage – and some doomsayers predict that will force school districts to end this school year early as they run out of cash.
The heart of the problem is the two-thirds supermajority that California requires to pass a state budget.
“California is one of the few states that foolishly require a two-thirds legislative vote for passage of a budget or tax increase,” veteran Los Angeles Times Sacramento columnist George Skelton wrote today. “That leads to minority tyranny and gridlock.”
Gov. Schwarzenegger won't let go of his support for the supermajority requirement even though the consequences are on his shoulders.
Closing school districts down early for the summer is an emergency response "folks in education have said is a possibility," state schools Superintendent Jack O’Connell’s press secretary, Hillary McLean, told the press yesterday. That would be a first in California, but it happened in Oregon school districts five years ago, the Contra Costa Times reports.
Skelton’s Dec. 11 column blasts the supermajority requirement (one of those fixes that just sounds so good at the time and has unforeseen disastrous consequences). And he lays into state elected officials for their stubbornness and their misunderstanding of their role:
Particularly tiresome has been the repeated, inbred auto-response from Republican legislators, new and old, that a recession is no time to be raising taxes; it just makes the economy worse.
Of course, the modern GOP thinks there's never a good time to raise taxes. But leave that aside.
A little civics refresher is needed here: The main responsibility of a state legislator is not to repair or even fret about the economy. That's a federal task. Washington is allowed to print funny money and run deficits. The state must make ends meet.
The principal duty of a state lawmaker -- as opposed to a member of Congress -- is to pass an honestly balanced budget and make sure spending and revenue match. Or else state government eventually implodes -- stops paying vendors, halts construction projects, can't even borrow. That's almost where we are now.
Yes, higher taxes hurt the economy. But guess what: So does cutting back on government spending. Fired state workers can't buy from local merchants. When construction projects are stopped, contractors lose money and workers get laid off. Reduce welfare and the poor have even less to spend at the grocery.
Short-term: Legislators, especially the pigheaded Republicans, have to give, or our entire state will suffer. Long-term. We need to eliminate the two-thirds supermajority requirement. How many near-disasters (or at least let’s hope it’s only a near-disaster) do we have to suffer before voters grasp that we made a mistake?
San Jose Mercury News
Democrats' budget ploy could shake up balance of power in Sacramento
By Mike Zapler
Mercury News
Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, left, and Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, D-Los Angeles, talk about their plan to resolve the state budget deficit at a news conference before the legislature votes at the Capitol in Sacramento on Wednesday. (Steve Yeater / AP)
When legislative Democrats last week unveiled a risky gambit to raise billions in new revenue by exploiting a loophole in the state Constitution, it was more than just a bid to prop up the sagging general fund. The move threatened to realign the balance of power in Sacramento — and strip Republicans of their most important source of political influence, the ability to block tax increases.
"We're going to govern, with or without our Republican colleagues," warned new Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg repeatedly in recent weeks as negotiations over the state's massive $40 billion deficit remained deadlocked.
Whether Democrats can get away with that is another matter. Their proposal attempts to do an end-run on one of the most ingrained assumptions of state governance: That any tax increase must be approved by a two-thirds majority, and thus needs at least some Republican votes.
The Democrats' complicated plan would essentially replace taxes with fees, which need only a majority vote. It would generate $18 billion, slightly more than half in new revenue.
But although the plan cleared both legislative houses on near party-line votes, it faces legal and political hurdles, including a threatened veto by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. In one promising early sign for Democrats, the governor did not take issue with the tax proposal itself; instead, he said the plan does not do enough to cut spending and stimulate the economy.
If the governor eventually gets on board, taxpayer groups have promised to sue and go to the ballot to overturn the deal. Steinberg, who took over as Senate leader just this month, said the Legislature's lawyers have assured him the plan will hold up in court, but the matter is hardly clear cut.
One legal expert likened the proposal to an accountant finding clever ways to reduce a client's tax bill.
"The line between tax planning and tax evasion is often paper-thin," said Floyd Feeney, a professor at University of California-Davis School of Law. "Whether this is good enough to fit into the tax planning category or is over the line is not an easy question to answer."
Tony Quinn, a Republican political analyst who has worked in and around the Legislature for four decades, predicted courts would not intervene to stop the plan. "They are very leery of getting involved in how the Legislature and governor pass laws," he said.
If courts do give the green light, the political ramifications could be sweeping. Republicans fret this would be the first of many Democratic attempts to raise new revenue by replacing taxes with fees.
"There will be tax after tax after tax," said Sen. George Runner, R-Lancaster. "Californians should be scared."
Steinberg has as much as conceded that Democrats will use the tactic again if it proves successful. And GOP legislators would be powerless to stop it.
Quinn said Republicans made a serious strategic mistake by not engaging with Democrats on taxes. Instead, they proposed a budget heavily dependent on spending cuts while refusing to consider tax increases.
That prompted the Democratic majority to pursue what Quinn called "the nuclear option." If successful, it would leave Republicans powerless to push through any of the government reforms they want.
"Republicans are reaching the point," he said, "where they will not be relevant to the political process."
Indeed, when budget negotiations resume, legislative Republicans will find themselves on the outside looking in as Democrats and Schwarzenegger work to resolve their differences.
GOP legislative leaders seemed almost resigned to that fact. But they suggested at the same time that if the courts fail to step in, voters would have the last say, as they often do in California. Conservative interest groups are already gearing up for an initiative battle to invalidate the Democrats' move.
Said Senate Republican Leader Dave Cogdill: "People like the checks and balances that are in place now."
However it turns out, the Democratic proposal certainly shook up what had become a paralyzing debate in Sacramento.
"There hasn't been a really interesting idea in the budget discussions for a long time," said Phil Isenberg, a former Democratic state legislator and Sacramento mayor. "This is very interesting, and I mean that sincerely."
Contact Mike Zapler at mzapler@mercurynews.com or (916) 441-4603.